User talk:Aanchalmahlotra

https://s.Lawadvisorindia.com

lawadvisorindia.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aanchalmahlotra (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The information of the countries which are ineligible for the PIO card is insufficient. The link attached has the right information. I am not sure why has it been considered an SEO trick? Aanchalmahlotra (talk) 13:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Funny how one corporate website just happens to be the best available source for topics ranging from divorce to citizenship. It's a SEO trick because it's meant to drive traffic to that company by adding plausible-seeming links. Huon (talk) 22:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You'll be happy to know that I fixed the PIO link with an updated link to the same source, instead of the website you are spamming on behalf of. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The "broken link" SEO trick

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UNblock discussion

Probably to be unblocked you'll need to agree not to link to or edit about https://s.Lawadvisorindia.com. Not sure about the other link you added. Please tell us what constructive edits you would make to help build Wikipedia, the largest free content encyclopedia in the world. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 17:38, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]