User talk:ANode/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:ANode. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- R3hab discography
- added a link pointing to Alan Walker
- Syn Cole
- added a link pointing to Alan Walker
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Review of page Jason van Wyk
Hello! I see you’ve contributed to a lot of EDM artists over the years. The page for Jason van Wyk, a Black Hole Recording artist, which I contribute to is under consideration for deletion, which I feel strongly is incorrect. He is a notable artist and I have added multiple notable sources to the article, yet I’m not receiving much support on keeping it. I was wondering if you could review it and leave your vote? Thanking you. Socrates 2 (talk) 13:07, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Socrates 2: Hey there, took a glance through the page and the "Career" section looks generally well written and sourced, but there are still concerns about this artist's notability since I made a Google search and there was no exclusive website discussing him or his latest releases (compared to someone like David Guetta when you Google his name and tons of music blogs show up talking about what he's released). Here's what you can do, I normally judge an artist's notability by how much music blogs write on their new track releases, so if you can paste 3 links of reliable dance blogs like Dancing Astronaut or Your EDM (or any sources in my Wikipedia profile's "Reliable sources for electronic music referencing" section) discussing his new songs ([something like this]), I'll give my input on the deletion page.aNode (discuss) 15:56, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imanbek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Walker.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EarthGang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Snakehips.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brooks (DJ), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Walker.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matisse & Sadko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Martin.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Two Friends (DJs), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Fitzpatrick.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Using Template:Rating for publications that do not award stars
Hi. I noticed with this edit to Paradise Again, you used Template:Rating for Clash, which does not award stars in their ratings. We should not use the template for publications that do not do this. (Also, on Clash, the writer is listed at the end of the article, so their articles are not written by a "staff writer".) Thanks. Ss112 08:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Yeahhh my bad, was a bit late last night when I was editing hahaha, thanks for fixing the refs and formatting up! aNode (discuss) 08:51, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,