User talk:ANGGUN

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/AlexLevyOne(5th). Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 20:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on History of the Jews in the Netherlands worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. sinneed (talk) 23:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Citizen K has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

Yo ANGGUN, I noticed you removing several red links from articles. This is not always a good idea, as red links serve as reminders of topics that should have articles, and make it easier for readers to create them. Please have a read of WP:REDLINK and reconsider. Sincerely, the skomorokh 20:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Yes Man (film) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jan eissfeldt (talk) 02:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop being disruptive. Multiple people have reverted your removal of red links. Can I suggest trying to turn a red link into a blue link? For example, Roberto Schaefer was just created today. —Erik (talk • contrib) 02:10, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job ! keep on creating ! Cheers ANGGUN:03:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC) (in France)

Anggun, as stated above, red links must often be kept. Instead of removing them, and before creating the article, see if an article with a similar name does not already exist. For example, in Albert I, Prince of Monaco, I changed the red link "Prince Festetics von Tolna" to Tassilo Festetics von Tolna. In some cases, you may also create a redirect to the correct article. Please read WP:REDLINK, thanks. — Xavier, 02:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. . Your presistant removing of red links with no reason will lead you to a block. Please stop. — Xavier, 02:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Thank you, I had not seen that article before, and I have killed a few red links that, after reading, I should have left in. I was ready to leap to ANGGUN's defense on this one... now I understand. All the best to all 5 of you. sinneed (talk) 02:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

love the reference to George Bush, so funny, an example among any else ! User:ANGGUN, 02:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Julia Louis-Dreyfus. sinneed (talk) 03:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE - you have much to offer Wikipedia. But spamming History of Jews in Alsace is not it. Please don't delink Jew or Jewish and redirect it to History of Jews in Alsace. It will mislead readers. sinneed (talk) 03:10, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why, this is just precision, the Louis-Dreyfus family is originally from Alsace. What's the problem ? User:ANGGUN, 03:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you click a link titled "Armenian" and it took you to "History of Armenians in Pawtucket", you would be confused. It is not precision. If you made the link read "Alsatian Jew" and linked to "History of Jews in Alsace" that would not be confusing. sinneed (talk) 03:18, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --VS ^talk 03:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The editors who have taken note of this problem editor here should understand that this block will likely result in the abandonment by the user of this account, and creation of a new one with which to continue his -- *questionable* edits. See Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/AlexLevyOne(5th) for the briefest of backstory. There is not much to be done about the problem prospectively but quick action when a new account comes on line and begins to edit can at least reduce the damage that this determined and prolific vandal can inflict from a given account. Please put a watch on a couple of the most significant subject pages and keep an eye out for similar edits from new accounts. JohnInDC (talk) 03:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet editor has moved on

This user is now editing as User:Alex Levy. JohnInDC (talk) 12:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kourtrajmé

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kourtrajmé, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability not established, and, based on web searches, not apparent.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JohnInDC (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]