User talk:ALIwaince

Welcome!

Leave your message below

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work on clan system Smartperson31 (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship

Please read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship before attempting to start an RfA. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer#User:ALIwaince

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer#User:ALIwaince. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for adminship

Twice within the last week [1][2] you've attempted to stand for administrator at WP:RFA. In a section above on this talk page, you've been directed to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship. In editing the WP:RFA page, you've been shown a large stop sign and "Wait!" in big red letters. The paragraph associated with those warnings signs tell you to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship (again) and Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates. Despite these words of caution, you've continued to attempt to transclude your non-existent request for adminship.

There is a level of good faith assumption that is certainly granted to relatively inexperienced users who think they are ready for adminship, but clearly are not. Attempting to tranclude your RfA once, as you have, will likely result in it being removed and some guidance placed on your talk page, as was done here in this case. Doing so twice, and even moreso only separated from the last time you attempted it by days, shows that you haven't read the advice and are continuing ahead anyway. If you do so a third time any time soon it will likely be viewed as an attempt to disrupt the project.

I caution you to stop attempting to transclude an RfA at this time. Given that you've twice now done an incorrect transclusion, given that you've been here only about two months, given your low edit count, it is essentially impossible for you to pass RfA at this time. I strongly, strongly recommend you wait at least a year, if not two years, and amass some experience on the project and show with your work that you have need of the tools. As is, you are severely lacking in that experience base.

If you have questions, let me know. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Millat Chowk

Hi, I'm Boleyn. ALIwaince, thanks for creating Millat Chowk!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Would you be able to add a bit more information, 'location' doesn't give us a clear idea.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAK

Welcome!

Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining WikiProject Pakistan, and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) Mar4d (talk) 09:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:

You can give your input on issues at the project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
You can add the project's to do list to your watchlist and help in what interests you.
You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan-related article on Wikipedia.
Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
Add your name in the members' list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

Mar4d (talk) 09:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Hanjra. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Please stop moving pages to titles with "(Cricketer)" as the disambig. This is incorrect, and the articles you've moved were also at the correct page title to begin with, as there are other cricketers with those names. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ALIwaince. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tariqabad Flyover

The article Tariqabad Flyover has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG. Non-notable bridge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. South Nashua (talk) 14:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tariqabad Flyover for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tariqabad Flyover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariqabad Flyover until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 23:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Waince Jatt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waince Jatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waince Jatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 04:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ilm-ud-din

I see you haven't edited for a month or two, and this is about an edit from November, but, for the record, this edit is seriously problematic. You added honorifics to someone's name, which is an MoS violation. But more importantly, your addition of those honorifics pushed a point of view—and not just any PoV, but a PoV in favor of religious violence. Such edits are simply unacceptable. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 02:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Waince Jatt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Waince Jatt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Waince Jatt

Hello, ALIwaince. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Waince Jatt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ALIwaince. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ALIwaince. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Millat Chowk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Millat Chowk, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Millat Chowk

Hello, ALIwaince. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Millat Chowk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking help editing an article

Hi @ALIwaince:

I am a student who is new to Wikipedia. In one of my subjects, I am editing and updating the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement article. I saw that you are a member of Wikiproject: Pakistan and was wondering if you would be able to provide me with some feedback and help me improve it.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! :)

S2102sa (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Appreciate all your hard work for creating and maintaining the TOWN articles related to Punjab, Pakistan. Saw it today and I will try to do my share of it whenever I can. Wassalaam and Best Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 22:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Warraich (clan) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warraich (clan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warraich (clan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GTrang (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]