Jump to content

User talk:AKAK2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Nick Moyes. I noticed that you recently removed content from K. Annamalai without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nick Moyes (talk) 20:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AKAK2021, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi AKAK2021! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annamalai Kuppuswamy (July 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. (To avoid the possibility of a surprisingly common misunderstanding, editing is part of paid work if it is done as part of normal employment or as part of a work to a contract, whether or not a specific payment earmarked for editing Wikipedia is made.) Furthermore, please bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a medium for promoting or publicising anything or anyone. JBW (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at K. Annamalai. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]