User talk:A11Offense

Welcome!

Hello, A11Offense, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 18:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia

Your recent addition to A-11 offense has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Even if you have copyright to the text and wish to license it for free use under Creative Commons or GFDL, it would still need heavy editing for use here, because it is not written in encyclopedic tone. —C.Fred (talk) 18:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A11Offense for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Fred. Our Wikipedia Account confirmation email is @a11offense.com. Your revisions back to the factually incorrect version of the A-11 Offense is inaccurate. Please refrain from any further inaccurate revisions.

The issue currently isn't accuracy. It's copyright infringement and secondarily edit warring. You are in apparent violation of the three-revert rule at A-11 offense. —C.Fred (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have knowledge of how the a-11 offense works, then attempt to edit A-11 Offense correctly. But, since you are not privy to how the new version works, whatever you post will be inaccurate.

Has the new A-11 gotten any independent coverage? Or is the only resource the original research of its creators? —C.Fred (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring on the A-11 offense article. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]