User talk:A.Donaire2005

Welcome!

Hello, A.Donaire2005, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Category:Buildings and structures demolished in 2024, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buildings and structures demolished in 2024

A tag has been placed on Category:Buildings and structures demolished in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Flags introduced in 2024

A tag has been placed on Category:Flags introduced in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Symbols introduced in 2024

A tag has been placed on Category:Symbols introduced in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Flags introduced in 2024

A tag has been placed on Category:Flags introduced in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. DB1729^talk 13:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Inauguration of Joe Biden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Improper edit: 1236441537

August 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at TV Tokyo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 16:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to List of last surviving World War II veterans. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 22:25, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

We do not reupload images in English if they are in a secondary language, as translation tools exist to do so. I also have reverted your inappropriate additions of content to Japanese networks as there are proper processes to do so. Please edit properly. Nate • (chatter) 16:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Studios and Networks

Regarding your edits to various studios and their networks, I've been reverting them because I see no real need to list them on the studio pages. They're fine being linked on the anime series' main pages themselves, because that's where their relevance is in where they've aired, but I don't think they have much relevance on the studio pages themselves. They're often not involved with deciding which studios work on what, the studios themselves pretty much never decide, and I'm of the opinion that it's especially problematic as infobox clutter, especially in cases where five or six networks are listed (look no further than the clutter problem on OLM's page now that it has it). I don't believe the networks are contributing much to the page. Sarca sc (talk) 00:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But what do you say if I have identified which Japanese TV networks were where those anime from different studios were broadcast and it must be as it was, but why? A.Donaire2005 (talk) 08:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, why do you delete it if it is supposed to remain that way with its respective Japanese networks where the anime was broadcast? A.Donaire2005 (talk) 08:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese networks are already identified on the individual pages for each anime. The networks are "important", but rarely to the point that they're something that I think needs to be identified on a list of a studio's works. It's important to the individual works themselves, thus why they're always listed on the anime page infoboxes; but I don't think adding the information of those networks is really suitable for the studio pages. It's just adding a lot of information and cluttering the pages. I think the same about "producers" (note, not "animation producers"), they're important, but there's usually a lot of them so it can clutter studio infoboxes and it's more relevant to the production committee who is hiring the studio for work than the studio itself (and in most cases, the studio is not a part of the production committee), so that kind of information I would say is best on the series' articles itself. Studios rarely are involved in deciding where a series airs (what networks) and vice versa, too. Sarca sc (talk) 08:59, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Golgo 13, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]