User talk:95.168.107.28

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.168.107.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I blocked without any report and any reason? Is it because I have contested the closure request and I actually had valid arguments? I've just started to expose the bias and then you block me without amy explanation95.168.107.28 (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A reason has been given, "logged out editing". Please speak to that. 331dot (talk) 21:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot. I'm affraid we have bigger problems here. The IP is correct. Bbb23 has started blocking this editor for various reasons. None of which are correct. This all started when the IP has made a valid points in the closure request and when he indeed proved bias. This has bad smell all over it. Bbb23, please address this. The reason you gave is incorrect. It would be good to cease before this escalates more. First you blocked him with explanation "Disruptive editing" and now with the reason "logged out editing". Trimpops2 (talk) 22:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what your interest is here, but if you have a grievance with Bbb23, you should go to WP:ANI. I would think very carefully about it before you do, as your actions will be examined as well. 331dot (talk) 22:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He was the next in line to be blocked by Bbb23. Bbb23 started blocking everyone who participated in that closure request.95.168.107.28 (talk) 23:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.168.107.28 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

331dot. Can I be unblocked if I prove to you that this isn't correct?

Decline reason:

I believe that the reason given by the blocking administrator is correct, but even if it isn't this IP address should remain blocked because of disruptive and belligerent editing, and because it has been blatantly used to evade a block on another IP address. JBW (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For maximum fairness, someone else should review your request. 331dot (talk) 23:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Ok. Then this question is addressed to the other reviewer. Thank you. 95.168.107.28 (talk) 23:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

331dot this is really taking too long. I have asked a simple yes/no question. 95.168.107.28 (talk) 12:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are around 150 unblock requests waiting for action, and reviewing unblock requests is a contentious area that many admins aren't interested in participating in, so there are relatively few who participate. Once we review one, we aren't supposed to review another, which reduces the pool of admins further. It's also the weekend, when fewer people are on Wikipedia generally. You will need to be patient. I suggest that, while you wait, if you have evidence to support your claim of admin misconduct or that the block was against policy, that you provide it now as part of your request. 331dot (talk) 12:33, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

331dot, I didn't know that. Ok, I can easily prove that it is false that I've been editing logged out. Bbb23, present your evidence. 95.168.107.28 (talk) 12:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He didn't present any evidence initially. He didn't open a report to present any evidence. He was pinged here and still didn't present any evidence. 95.168.107.28 (talk) 12:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proxy

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy, such as a VPN service. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you are using an open proxy or VPN service, you will need to disable it or turn it off in order to edit Wikipedia.

If you believe you are not using an anonymizing proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer using your IP address who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the Unblock Ticket Request System.

More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). For more information, see the WikiProject on Open Proxies.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using an open or anonymizing proxies in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

Yamla (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.