User talk:92.245.5.133

December 2024

Hello, I'm Tessaract2. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to YSL Records racketeering trial have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Tessaract2^Hi! 20:22, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at YSL Records racketeering trial. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Have you even reviewed the edits? There is nothing "unconstructive" about anything, it's just pure facts. I'm talking bout my latest edit, not the one that got reverted first. I'm undoing your revert and if you undo my undoing, tell me what I'm doing wrong specifically, I don't understand what's so "unconstructive" about my edits. There is also no vandalism, not in the one you reverted. 92.245.5.133 (talk) 21:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for your edit? PhilKnight (talk) 21:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit? There already is a source, and if you're talking about the sidebar then yes, I can attribute it if you want to. 92.245.5.133 (talk) 21:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you attribute it? Also, I wouldn't WP:Edit War with Daniel - he is likely to block you if you do. I suggest you post on the talk page with your proposed edit. PhilKnight (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will concede you one point ... your edits, since they would facially be good-faith constructive edits, should not have been called vandalism. However, you added information to the article infobox (a designated contentious topic area) which is not only unsourced as has been noted below but stated a long list of the charges that was needlessly repetitive.

So, I have warned you for disruptive editing rather than vandalism. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. To the sources, I can add them. To the length, that's just how it's officially in the documents, particularly here https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/young-slime-life-indictment.pdf. I could shorten the list in a logical way if it's necessary tho. So, can I do it? 92.245.5.133 (talk) 21:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK ... glad to hear it. My suggestion: in this edit, note that it has "Participation in criminal street gang activity, Participation in criminal street gang activity" and other things like that. It probably would be easier and more reader-friendly to just state the charge once with a number of the total counts in parentheses afterwards. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I was thinking, thank you. 92.245.5.133 (talk) 22:04, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at YSL Records racketeering trial, you may be blocked from editing. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Wikipedia Tough here can you tell what's wrong with my edits? You want a source for them or sum? I can attribute a source or two if you want to 92.245.5.133 (talk) 21:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See above. And remember to be civil. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.