User talk:92.236.211.53

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Talk:Ned Kelly and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 08:43, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm VQuakr. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 19:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used sources provided by original creator of the paragraph and left them unchanged. I was under the assumption that in some contexts, social media is an acceptable citation, and I believed this applied as its video evidence that was recordered and posted during the begining month of the current isreal invasion. The contribution I'm referring to is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1190975530

If it is so that it doesn't apply that so be it, ZinderBoffs reason for removal tho was simply due to "bias", which I can't deny.

I explained this in my notes of the edit.

I've just now learned that you're also reffering to the readding of the MK Ultra paragraph. I don't like adding paragraphs to Wikipedia. I don't want to write new info that's accessible + reliable as you can see from my edit history. If I do add information that is unsourced like the isreal paragraph or the mk ultra documentary, it is because it was already added and removed for reasons I thought unnecessary, for mk ultra I thought that it was notable information and that is had its own Wikipedia page meant that it should stay even with no source. I skim read the paragraph, entirely my own fault.

I'll be more careful in the future tho, as you probably know better than me and I can see how this thinking is a slippery slope. 92.236.211.53 (talk) 23:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024

Your recent editing history at Languages of Somalia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a talk page on this issue from your first revert of my edit that you haven't used despite me notifying you on your talk page about it's existance because I could see you would revert any removals of that paragraph, I even added the part in my edit summary directed at you, imploring you to use the talk page! You never responded to my notification and infact deleted it from your talk page with the only summary being "sockpuppetry"

I made a talk page for this dispute as soon as it came to my attention, I messaged you about it, I waited 20 whole days before making another edit while not only adding a plea for anyone who has an issue with it to discuss in the talk page, but a reply to that very own page about the issue before I even made an edit. I have abided by Wikipedia policies to the best of my knowledge and can see no rule breaking nor edit waring in my behaviour in Languages of Somalia.

I will be requesting a dispute resolution for this conflict with you as I feel I've done all I can that will be productive. 92.236.211.53 (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.