User talk:89MsHm

Welcome!

Hello, 89MsHm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Gullu Yologlu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Everymorning (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gullu Yologlu

The article Gullu Yologlu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Everymorning (talk) 10:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dr Gullu Yologlu.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Dr Gullu Yologlu.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Gullu Yologlu.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Gullu Yologlu.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Dr Gullu Yologlu.jpeg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr Gullu Yologlu.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gullu Yologlu.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gullu Yologlu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gullu Yologlu (Mammadli).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gullu Yologlu (Mammadli).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history at Armenians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Étienne Dolet (talk) 06:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Gullu Yologlu (Mammadli).jpg

Hello, 89MsHm. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Gullu Yologlu (Mammadli).jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following message has been left at the OTRS noticeboard

"A statement of permission for the picture at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Gullu_Yologlu_(Mammadli).jpg#Summary has been re-sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Also the person in the photo has expressed that the photographer, who is the person under the username 89MsHm also permits to upload the photo. So it's me who took the photo. Both the photographer and the person in the photo allow the picture to be used for any purpose at Wikipedia or anywhere else. Thank you 89MsHm (talk) 00:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC)"

89MsHm 00:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

The Arbitration Committee has authorized uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on users who edit pages related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, including this page.

Provided the awareness criteria are met, discretionary sanctions may be used against editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process.

}}--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is very sad that you are using your authority to impose your personal political views on certain articles and pressure some users on Wikipedia which harms the principles of objectivity and credibility of the source. --89MsHm (talk) 11:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not worry, Armenians say precisely the same.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They are more thankful than dissatisfied for your edits. --89MsHm (talk) 11:42, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. They say I am a paid agent of Azerbaijan.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits don't say that. Also there are Azerbaijanis on your talk page complain about your biased edits to articles related to Azerbaijan. Your impartiality is already under question. --89MsHm (talk) 12:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good, take me to WP:ANI or WP:AN.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --89MsHm (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Having spotted this , could I request action be taken here following these edits by 89MsHm on the Karabakh article. I happened across a series of dubious edits to this article yesterday and restored text that was deleted for apparently Azeri POV reasons. 89MsHm has since removed it again twice using misleading edit summaries (claiming vandalism and the removal of references). Cheers, Number 5 7 10:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: And now another misleading edit summary accompanying another removal. If you could also restore the content and possibly lock the article (I notice it was previously fully-protected for several months presumably due to this sort of thing), that would be great. Number 5 7 11:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think in this situation it is better if a different administrator takes action (you can also try Arbitration enforcement).--Ymblanter (talk) 14:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However, looking at the diff, Karabakh is in Azerbaijan and not in Armenia.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There was a misunderstanding. I hadn't paid attention that someone had vandalized the article before the reversion. I have stopped removing it and instead improved the article.--89MsHm (talk) 11:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Çocuq Mərcanlı

Just to let you know, if you make any further changes that mean the name in the article is different to the article title, you'll be blocked for disruptive editing. If you think the name is wrong, then you need to move the article, either using the move tab or the WP:RM process (I don't know why you have not done this already. It's not difficult). In the meantime, you6 should not change the name in the article to something that is different to the article's title. Number 5 7 12:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an important article and it cannot be removed. But the title is wrong and it should be corrected. --89MsHm (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So correct it then. You should see a "Move" tab at the top of the article. You can use this to move the article to what you think is the correct title. Number 5 7 12:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! --89MsHm (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Artsakh

Would it be more sensible to make this a subcategory of Category:Armenia? Rathfelder (talk) 09:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it was inside Armenia then it would. But in this case it doesn't make sense. --89MsHm (talk) 15:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 89MsHm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 89MsHm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Safavid dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AA2 advisory

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- LouisAragon (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Safavid dynasty; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wario-Man (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dolma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shushi

Hi. Article on Shushi has a talk page, you're free to post/discuss your opinion there. Have a good day! Vaan23 (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Maidyouneed (talk) 10:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stuffed grape leaves

Hi. The commonly marketed food "grape leaves" or "stuffed grape leaves" has no article of its own on Wikipedia. Where would you suggest foodies looking for that should turn to? Dolma is that dish. Wolfdog (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. But the article already has a section named "Wrapped vine leaves". What will change if you add it in the beginning? 89MsHm (talk) 15:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It will notify users unfamiliar with Turkic-language terminology that they're at the right place. Is it not the case that these English terms are common in marketing? Would you like me to produce sources suggesting that they can be used interchangeably (though I appreciate the distinction you're trying to make)? Wolfdog (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, the more I look, the more Sarma might be the right source. Wolfdog (talk) 22:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I also think that Sarma type of wrapped wine leaves is more popular among English speaking audience. 89MsHm (talk) 13:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]