Jump to content

User talk:89.15.237.48

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm RandomCanadian. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Responsibility for the Holocaust, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk | contribs) 22:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


The source for the declaredly mad (Whiteheadsches Syndrom) Jews

[edit]

was Eva Maria Remarque: "Im Westen nichts Neues"

could you incorporate this then back again, together with mentioned source ?

Note, that you verge towards Holocaust-denial

Lutz Fehling

89.15.237.48 (talk) 22:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Erich Maria Remarque's Im Westen nichts Neues -- known in English as All Quiet on the Western Front -- is a work of fiction, and cannot be used as a source for factual information.
There is no "Holocaust denial" happening here, there is merely the insistence that information be properly supported by factual reliable sources. If you are unwilling to do that, then I'm afraid you are not suited to editing English Wikipedia. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, fact and fiction are there mingled

[edit]

The diagnosis as such can't be denied

Lutz Fehling

89.15.237.48 (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no doubt that there is a factual basis for many of the things in All Quiet on the Western Front, but it remains the fact that you cannot use a work of fictionas a WP:reliable source -- please read that policy. If that aspect of the novel is accurate, then some non-fiction work will discuss that, and that can be used as a supporting source. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note, that widely known facts need no source, according to wikipedia rules

[edit]

Lutz Fehling

89.15.239.216 (talk) 18:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True, that the sky is blue does not need to be sourced, but this is not an example of that. The fact that nothing can be found on Google is telling. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At least you are able to talking ☺️

[edit]

When this can't be found on Google - I don't know.

Note, that America did a lot for us.

Lutz Fehling

89.15.237.72 (talk) 17:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At least you are able to talking ☺️

[edit]

When this can't be found on Google - I don't know.

Note, that America did a lot for us.

Lutz Fehling

89.15.237.72 (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]