Jump to content

User talk:86.156.161.55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Superstars has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing That Should Not Be (talk) 20:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 86.156.161.55, has made unhelpful edits to the page Meredith Kercher, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Addbot (talk) 00:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Grifomaniacs (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no - nothing wrong with reverting you there. Certainly not vandalism. See BRD pablo 15:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, but what's the point of reverting *during* a discussion instead of joining it? Maybe that wasnt vandalism, sure that edit was unhelpful. Better to discuss in the talk page. --Grifomaniacs (talk) 16:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Murder of Meredith Kercher. Thank you.TMCk (talk) 20:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Murder of Meredith Kercher, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.TMCk (talk) 20:53, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Meredith Kercher, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. You were bold, you ware already reverted & you didn't discuss on the talkpage. Disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. Jarkeld (talk) 21:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Murder of Meredith Kercher shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You have reverted other editors at least five times within the last 24 hours. Any further edit-warring will be reported to WP:AN3. SuperMarioMan 15:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. SuperMarioMan 21:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Murder of Meredith Kercher. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.