Jump to content

User talk:86.152.210.110

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2021

[edit]

Please stop adding your facts to the Wikipedia page Untitled Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse sequel. I would recommend you should move on to creating Reddit posts, instead, to showcase your Spider-Man facts, rather than devoting any more time to Wikipedia. Cardei012597 (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I really do believe you should create a Reddit post to showcase your facts on everything Spider-Man related. Or maybe edit on IMDb or even create your very own website at https://www.godaddy.com/offers/website-builder/website?isc=wsbg012&gclid=CjwKCAjw07qDBhBxEiwA6pPbHgrwEdIs0hu_Juw1WYKky89_UWj9hr62O3E2bPSfl5s8-hqvWXvqAxoCrCYQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds
All of these are better options to showcase your Spider-Man knowledge, rather than Wikipedia. The above websites are free to use and will permanently archive your work and information. I highly suggest doing these, as they are better places to edit at. Cardei012597 (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On all of these above links, you can edit freely, without interference from others. You can edit your facts on the above website links as much as you want, without anyone reverting your work, unlike Wikipedia. So, I do not believe Wikipedia should be the place for your work, and I hope you can agree. Cardei012597 (talk) 00:54, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Untitled Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse sequel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Johnuniq (talk) 07:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages

[edit]

I have reverted your edits at Talk:Kane (wrestler). Article talk pages are for actionable proposals to improve the article. Rather than complaining, please quote some text which should be changed and add a brief explanation of what it should say and why.

Do not use a talk page for rants. That means all-caps headings are out, as is "FOR FUCK SAKE!". You will be blocked if problems continue. Johnuniq (talk) 01:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]