Jump to content

User talk:86.128.175.64

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop misusing Wikipedia as a soapbox/social network, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

School uniform

[edit]

Please do not spam my talk page with such stupidity.--Khajidha (talk) 20:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You have spammed many users with a Change.org link despite the first warning. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:27, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.128.175.64 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have removed the links. 86.128.175.64 (talk) 20:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.128.175.64 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have removed the links. So the block is not necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for and will not continue to cause damage or disruption 86.128.175.64 (talk) 20:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When you have an edit you want to make, you can tell us what it is at that time. Since you decline to give an example now, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 21:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've made zero useful edits toward building an encyclopedia. You're going to need to tell us what kind of edits you plan on making if unblocked, with specific examples. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any kind. 86.128.175.64 (talk) 21:03, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you missed the "specific examples" part. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any kind of specific examples. 86.128.175.64 (talk) 21:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but can you provide a specific example of any kind of specific examples? —Tamfang (talk) 22:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that the next admin remove talk page access, since this is going nowhere. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]