User talk:Abul7ik

July 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Assala Nasri has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Assala Nasri was changed by 85Hikmat (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895347 on 2016-07-01T16:36:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hikmat Zaid moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hikmat Zaid. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick tip here: as I will be posting questions to you on the talk page of Draft talk:Hikmat Zaid, I would suggest you add that page to your Watchlist, if you have not done so already, so that I don't have to overlink the page with {{ping}} notifications. Kindly, Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:46, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of Fatah members. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abul7ik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abul7ik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block Appeal for Alternate Account Use :Subject: Block Appeal for Unintentional Use of Alternate Account :To whom ever it may concern :cc. @Dreamy Jazz @Bobby Cohn :I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the block placed on my account due to the use of an alternate account. I understand that using multiple accounts is generally against the rules, and I sincerely apologize for any confusion or issues this may have caused. I would like to explain the circumstances that led to this situation. :A while ago, I created my main account, User:Abul7ik, which I used to make contributions to the platform. However, after a significant period of inactivity, I forgot the login credentials for my main account. When I decided to return and continue contributing, I found myself unable to access my original account. :In my eagerness to resume editing, I made the mistake of creating a new account, User:Code59. I used this account to make several edits, mistakenly believing it was the best course of action since I couldn't recall my main account's details. Later, I managed to recover access to my main account, but unfortunately, I had already made edits under the alternate account. :I understand now that I should have sought assistance in recovering my original account instead of creating a new one. My intention was never to deceive or bypass any rules; it was simply an error due to my lack of understanding of the best practices in this situation. I value the contributions I've made and would like to continue doing so under my main account, User:Abul7ik. :I respectfully request that you consider lifting the block on my account. I assure you that I will use only my main account for future edits and will adhere strictly to the community's guidelines moving forward. :Thank you for your time and understanding. I look forward to your response and hope for a favorable resolution. :Sincerely, :Abul7ik (aka. Code59) Abul7ik (talk) 11:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not appear to match the visible timeline. You say you created the new account and made several edits and only later returned to this account. But I can clearly see you editing with this account repeatedly between August 6 and 9. So you clearly returned to this account immediately, not after making several edits with your other account. Additionally, there's other evidence of attempted deception listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abul7ik/Archive which you don't address. Yamla (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Hikmat Zaid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hikmat Zaid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikmat Zaid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fatah Advisory Council moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Fatah Advisory Council. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Transportation (Palestine) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ministry of Transportation (Palestine). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]