User talk:83.52.84.186

June 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for harassing other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

83.52.84.186 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What on earth? Who am I supposed to have been harrassing? I have done absolutely no such thing. 83.52.84.186 (talk) 09:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Speaking of sockpuppetry, it appears that you shouldn't be editing at all. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• When this block expires, if you suspect sockpuppetry then you need to file a report at WP:SPI and include your evidence (and note that the simple fact of a registered user and an IP both reverting you is not evidence of sockpuppetry). If, instead, you keep on making accusations without evidence, then it will be seen as continued harassment and you will face escalating blocks. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

I haven't "kept on" making accusations. I raised a question, it was discussed, the discussion ended. I raised another somewhat related question about a different user. If someone had told me to go to SPI, I would have gone to SPI. As for evidence, why are you misrepresenting the situation? The IP did not just revert me but also restored Beyond My Ken's attack on my talk page. How on earth is questioning such behaviour harrassment? Why not simply tell me what to do if I was doing something wrong? To block with no warning is outrageous. 83.52.84.186 (talk) 09:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

You made an unsupported accusation of sockpuppetry at WP:ANI and it was soundly rejected, but you just repeated the accusation with a second report, again with no evidence. A report to WP:SPI without evidence would get you no further. If you wish to make an unblock request, please follow the instructions in the block message and another admin will review it - I suggest that an agreement to drop this particular stick would help. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC) (Oops, sorry, struck that part Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC))

• It wasn't unsupported. I had a perfectly clear reason to question the behaviour I saw.
• I didn't repeat the accusation in a second report. I asked what standards of proof people were looking for, because it was claimed that there was "no evidence" of anything, when clearly there was.
• I made an unblock request already
• As people were unconcerned about the apparent sockpuppetry, I had no intention of discussing it further in any case so your patronising suggestions are unnecessary. My second report was more about the attacks made on me as a result of the first report, and you've also decided to attack me. What a fucking joke it is, when all you needed to do was say "here is where you go to report sockpuppetry concerns, and here is what you need to present as evidence." 83.52.84.186 (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

---