Jump to content

User talk:82.30.52.236

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Climate change, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article talkpages are not soapboxes

[edit]

The talkpages of articles are exclusively for concrete discussion of how to improve the articles, not for general discussion of article subjects. You have been using the talkpages of climate articles as soapboxes to express your opinion about global warming. There are lots of internet sites out there where you can do that, but Wikipedia is not one of them. Please stop before you're blocked from editing, as you are not only wasting your own time but also that of other editors. Bishonen | talk 16:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Talk of the kettle calling the pot black, my whole point is that the talk pages are just a soap box for idiotic views from environmentalist - and you have the stupidy to think doing anything to me will restore the lost credibility of wikipedia?

We sceptic won despite these stupid antics from the environmentalists that run wikipedia!

No global warming?

[edit]

Are you one of us that believes knows that global warming is not real? (if so, they should make a userbox for us) - ZLEA (talk) 19:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]