User talk:82.174.61.58

Drafts awaiting review

Draft:Ivan Bidnyak, Ukrainian sport shooter killed in an offensive in Kherson Oblast.
Draft:Alexander Kulyk, Ukrainian national track cycling coach, killed in the Kyiv offensive
Draft:2022 Ukrainian railway attacks, series of attacksby the Russian Army on the Ukrainian Railways infrasturcture
Draft:Oleg Amosov, Ukrainian economist, wounded in Kharkiv and died later
Draft:Vanda Obiedkova, Soviet / Ukrainian Holocaust survivor, died in the Siege of Mariupol
Draft:Yevhen Obedinsky, Ukrainian water polo player, died in the Siege of Mariupol

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to 2022 boycott of Russia and Belarus and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Minoa (talk) 18:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note

Hello and welcome! I just wanted to mention that your Drafts are public, and as such you shouldn't include copy-pasted copyrighted material from other places even if you're going to remove them later on, since the copyrighted content sticks around in the revision history. If you have any questions about it, feel free to comment here or leave me a message on my talk page! ★Ama ^TALK ^CONTRIBS 01:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes I see. It was 2 times a copy-paste error when adding the reference. 82.174.61.58 (talk) 06:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Artur Hrytsenko has been accepted

Artur Hrytsenko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Clarence Lee Evans, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@CollectiveSolidarity:, I see you reverted this edit stating “No categories in a redirect”. But take a look at Wikipedia:Redirect stating in the intro section “Redirect pages can contain other content below the redirect, such as redirect category templates, and category links (which provide a way to list article sections in categories).” 82.174.61.58 (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you’re right because WP:Categorization does state “Every Wikipedia page should belong to at least one category, except for talk pages, redirects, and user pages, which may optionally be placed in categories where appropriate.” Go ahead then, but I’d link the redirect to the namesake section of the article so readers might not be confused with the inclusion of a ship in “1942 deaths”. Also, I highly recommend that you get an account eventually. It could help with giving you access to protected pages and the like. Cheers! CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CollectiveSolidarity: thanks for your reply. For now I’m fine working under an IP, but yes, I’m thinking of getting back to an account but not now yet. 82.174.61.58 (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, they can link towards categories, but it's not customary for redirects to have categories of their own. Only in exceptional cases. The reason for this is if you're redirecting from X to Y and you'd put X into cat A, why not put Y into cat A instead? Amadeus²² 🙋 🔔 20:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

@Amadeus1999: I think this is one of this exceptional cases. The redirect page is of a person (for instance in category born 1904) that links to a ship that is named after that person àmd the person’s bio is described on the page of the ship. To add the category “1904 births” to the ship page in not correct. 82.174.61.58 (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it would certainly be a sight to see a ship give birth. If what you say is true, we should make a page for the person on its own and make a disambiguation somewhere down the line. If the person meets the requirements for eligibility anyway, like notability and such Amadeus²² 🙋 🔔 16:48, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vanda Obiedkova has been accepted

Vanda Obiedkova, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fade258 (talk) 11:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hryhoriy Skovoroda Literary Memorial Museum has been accepted

Hryhoriy Skovoroda Literary Memorial Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yevhen Obedinsky has been accepted

Yevhen Obedinsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:23, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Sander.v.Ginkel per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sander.v.Ginkel. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 07:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do see my comments at the SPI. It doesn't have to be this way. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 07:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fleur van Dooren has been accepted

Fleur van Dooren, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nobody (talk) 08:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Bad weather" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bad weather has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 23 § Bad weather until a consensus is reached. Konstantina07 (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your edit requests at Deaths in 2024

Hi. Thanks very much for all the help you give in alerting editors to deaths not yet added to the Deaths in 2024 list. However, can I remind you nicely to sign each and every request with the four tildes (~~~~)? Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 00:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the times I forgot it to do. 82.174.61.58 (talk) 20:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem - thanks for all your hard work. Ref ^(chew)(do) 00:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alberto De Simone has been accepted

Alberto De Simone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Macbeejack ☎ 12:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SV Althea has been accepted

SV Althea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Thanks for the article on SV Althea! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello! I'm Denisarona. Your recent edit(s) to the page Theben appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 09:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Rob Kaman. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 07:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko: I changed it per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section#Alternative biographical names stating “If a hypocorism (diminutive) that is common in English is often used for the subject in lieu of a given name, it is not inserted into the name or given after it” 82.174.61.58 (talk) 07:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- - @Adakiko: Because you don't reply here and also not on your talk page; and because I think my edit is an improvement of the Manual of Style, I reverted your edit. As it is no vandalism the edit I made on 1 April (and anyway done in good faith) I'm also thinking of removing your vandalism warning. 08:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:1905 shipwrecks, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 07:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko: Vandalism? I added the link of Cyprian, a submitted Draft and in my opinion a notable ship, to Template:1905 shipwrecks. After seeing Template:2022 shipwrecks and Template:2023 shipwrecks and per WP:Redlinks I thought it is allowed to add red links of notable ships? 82.174.61.58 (talk) 07:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Lake Suviana explosion. Borgenland (talk) 16:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be specific, you wrecked a whole article about an explosion and unilaterally turned it into a contradictory mess that has nothing to do with the title based on your POV proposal that no one has agreed with, forcing editors to conduct a massive cleanup of your mess when you could have made a separate article. If I catch you trying to tamper this article into something completely different again, I will have no choice but to report you to ANI. Borgenland (talk) 16:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Borgenland later stated (see Talk:2024 Lake Suviana explosion): "My apologies. At the time I was shocked when I first saw the extent that the article had been drastically altered and suspected vandalism. ...". 82.174.61.58 (talk) 09:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in 2022 Russian Aerospace Forces Antonov An-26 crash, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lachielmao (talk) 09:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lachielmao: Could you perhaps explain a little more about what is wrong with these edits you reverted? What is in this case according to you wrong with the style? 82.174.61.58 (talk) 09:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consistent grammatical errors throughout, references to information that is clearly visible elsewhere in the article other issues including removal of sources with no explanation, you made this article a mess. Lachielmao (talk) 09:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lachielmao: Might you reconsider your decision? You say what I did wrong "references to information that is clearly visible elsewhere". I referenced information I added myself. The content might be seen as controversial so better to have it well referenced (for example in the infobox). You also stated that I removed sources. That is not correct, I actually added an additional source. 82.174.61.58 (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

AfC notification: Draft:Charles Louis Wachter has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Charles Louis Wachter. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bargi hydroelectric power station has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bargi hydroelectric power station. Thanks! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on sockpuppetry

Assuming you are Sander.v.Ginkel, it seems likely you are to be re-blocked per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sander.v.Ginkel. You seem to be a good writer and I've often been upset coming across your name since I realize what a good writer we've lost. I wasn't here then, and I'm not sure what exactly caused it, but it seems it was over six years ago you were banned. That is a long time. As difficult as it may sound, may I suggest you go six months without any more socking, and then request the standard offer? I think there is a good chance it would be accepted (see e.g. Tamzin's comment here: I was torn on this. The IP does not seem to be creating the sort of low-quality BLP stubs that SportsOlympic was. If this were "just" a case of block evasion, I'm not sure I could justify a block of the IP as preventative of any disruption, and would be inclined to either ignore it or block but offer a non-OFFER unblock to the main account. However, Sander.v.Ginkel is banned ... Evading a ban is an inherent harm, as it undercuts the community's ability to self-govern ... I thus feel I would be defying the mandate the community has given me as an admin if I did anything but block here ... FWIW, Sander, I could see myself supporting an OFFER unban down the line). I want to see you back here eventually (even if you have no idea who I am), but if you continue socking that will never be able to happen. Feel free to email me if you like. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BeanieFan11, Although I revived the sock investigation (out of procedural responsibility), I second everything you said. I wish they'd follow all the procedures and will be given a pass. @Sander.v.Ginkel, please take whatever conditional offer the admins will give you and come clean. That'd mean a clearer and more sustainable path for everyone. You won't lose your hours, we'd also get more articles, and refrain from wasting time catching one more of the "rule breakers." Let's build this encyclopedia together. What's the point of losing your work again and again? We'd want to see you formally appealing and abiding by the offer/conditions the admins will give you. Take care. X (talk) 19:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 years for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Sander.v.Ginkel per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sander.v.Ginkel. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Artur Hrytsenko

Hello, 82.174.61.58. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artur Hrytsenko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.