Jump to content

User talk:81.35.37.251

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (81.35.37.251) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Left Bank Two

[edit]

Sorry, you were right. My bad. ∞southernkangarootalk23:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Legionnaires' disease, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. – bradv🍁 18:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
81.35.37.251 You may not be happy with what happens the next time you use the word "patronising". --Guy Macon (talk) 03:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. El_C 06:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 07:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.35.37.251 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I removed a personal attack against me, a deeply unpleasant and snide comment by an editor who is also making threats against me. Derogatory comments about other editors may be removed by any editor - that is policy.81.35.37.251 (talk) 07:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Someone asking if you understand something is not a personal attack, but a legitimate inquiry. Informing you of the consequences of your actions(being blocked) is a warning, not a 'threat'(though that terminology was used). I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.35.37.251 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Asking "Do you understand X?" might not be a personal attack. "What part of X don't you understand?" obviously is. I was entitled to removed it. An administrator of all people should not have restored it, and should not have violated the blocking policy by blocking me for following policy. And "Go ahead. Use the word "patronising" again. See what happens" is a threat, obviously. 81.35.37.251 (talk) 07:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That was not a personal attack. You continued removing that passage even after having been reverted multiple times and warned against doing so, which was the wrong call. El_C 07:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was a personal attack. I was entitled to removed it. According to an editor who removed something I wrote, personal attacks do not have to be extreme to be removed from an article talk page 81.35.37.251 (talk) 07:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]