User talk:81.100.64.222

Dwell (retailer)

Hi, I noticed you edited the Dwell retail page, to downgrade the company's status from 20 stores to 19. Please explain this to me; write to john_secure@yahoo.com. Please do not make further libelous edits to the Dwell (retailer). Dwell is a company and you must not make false edits to it's page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.64.222 (talk) 00:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, but can I please refer you to the rules of wikipedia, WP:AGF. I edited the article down from a piece of spam, to something which could pass for a suitable entry to an encyclopedia. The number of stores at that point according to teh companies website was 19 - hence the downgrade. The article still lacks inline references (the tag for which I note that you removed), and without such could therefore be subject to removal. As I assume you are associated with the company, please note your association on the articles talkpage under WP:BIAS, and add suitable inline references which back up the claims you have added. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Your recent edit to the page on Dwell Retail LTD was factually incorrect and was vandalism, as well as libel. Dwell Retail LTD is based in London, as anyone who does a basic check on Companies House website can determine. The information on the location of Dwell's head office is public information, in the public domain, as Dwell is a private limited company. Please DO NOT make up any more ficticious, libelous locations for Dwell's head office, or stores. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.64.222 (talk) 13:23, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it best you do not edit the page for Dwell Retail any more. It is not merely a wikipedia page; it is information you personally are placing on the public record, in writing. As such, you are immediately eligible for libel action. Especially if you decide to relocate the head office hundreds of miles across the UK without consulting the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.64.222 (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your messages. Please stop threatening me or any editor of wikipedia - this breaks WP:AGF. Secondly, as I assume you are either an employee or closely associated to DWELL, your edits break the rues on neutrality, and therefore you should not be editing the article. In note, your edits so far unable to address the issues required by the rules of wikipedia, and placing suitable WP:REF to confirm any claims or points made. Further you continue to add external links which break WP:SPAM - please stop adding spam links. I changed the location to Milton Keynes, because the only address on the website in both the consumer area and the legal area is Milton Keynes. I have returned it to London, but placed fact tags around these. In summary: learn the rules of wikipedia, and comply with them, or stop editing and adding spam. If you need any assistance to create a better and suitable article, I am happy to help. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 14:16, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DWELL

Note R.e. Dwell retail

External links added to article are NOT spam. They are articles written by a third party about Dwell Retail. The fact you see them as favourable perhaps is your problem. Dwell is a company in the UK - it received some funding recently. That is a matter of public fact, which a third party wrote an article about. You can continue to delete and suppress this information from Wikipedia, but others will simply continue to add it again. It's a matter of fact. It is not for some individuals on Wikipedia to decide what is or is not fact. You should learn that at the same time you learn Dwell is not based in Milton Keynes.

Removing external links to stories which relate to Dwell Retail means there is less information available to the public about Dwell Retail. This is not positive nor helpful.

Please note your edits will now be forwarded to an administrator, so your account may be blocked from further acts of vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.64.222 (talk) 17:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As per your request, I will ask an administrator to review your edit record, and conflict of WP:BIAS re DWELL. Having offered to help you to create an article of value, and yet you continue to threaten me and other editors, I am quite happy to reoslve the issue using wikipedia's formal processes and under our rules - Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 17:19, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dwell website/location

Quote: "For my part, I think it is appropriate that a person understands their legal obligations when placing information in the public domain. Specifically user Trident13 may not claim Dwell has it's head office in Milton Keynes because of a confusion on his/her part from the website. This is NOT stated on the website, and negligence may not be used as a defense in the UK legal system. It is technically an act of libel to make a false claim in writing." - 81.100.64.222

NOTE: Dwell retail, company website, Terms & Conditions - write to Dwell Retail Ltd, Milton Keynes. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 05:32, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COI conflict

In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Organizations and companies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of third-party sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones, or self-published sources) suggests to some editors that multiple independent reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:81.100.64.222 (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it … I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings … I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. --Trident13 (talk) 17:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on the WP:COIN project page with regards Dwell (retailer). You can follow the discussion at that projects page. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 19:33, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Trident13. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WAYNEOLAJUWON 17:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:Dwell (retailer). WAYNEOLAJUWON 17:48, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jsecure/81.100.64.222

Please stop tracing all articles edited by myself and adding derogatory tags to them. I will now speak with the police within the UK and my lawyers to see if a harassment action can be brought against you with the assistance of the Crown Prosecution Service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.64.222 (talk) 05:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not. The tags I apply are inline with wikipedia ruoles which I suggest you start to follow. I note that your edit record and that of the Jsecure are similar, and also both have given other editors "legal" threats. Please note rules on using multiple ID's. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 08:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:02, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article UltraStream, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/complements? Complaints and constructive criticism? 06:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Also: Please be aware that you are coming across as rather stubborn and refusing to admit you are wrong. please try and keep a cool head whenever editing. Thanks! Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/complements? Complaints and constructive criticism? 06:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:UltraStream‎

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:UltraStream‎, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. While the article may well be copyright according to your edit summary, the talkpage is not, and your continue acts of vandalism are unhelpful in light of the Articles proposed deletion discussion. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:UltraStream‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 22:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at UltraStream, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/complements? Complaints and constructive criticism? 22:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.