User talk:7arazred
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:04, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- 7arazred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 193.111.221.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
[[WP:Disruptive editing|Disruptive editing]]
Decline reason: You are blocked directly; you will need to explain your actions and give a reason for unblocking. Kuru (talk) 20:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
7arazred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
At first, the Expire Date was 1 December, then it just changed to 2 December, and then again to 3 December, so it's unfair to me, since I should have been unblocked on 1 December
Decline reason:
Not so. You are blocked indefinitely; that does not mean for ever, it means until you can satisfy the community that unblocking you will benefit the encyclopedia. Your call.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
7arazred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes, it so, because it said EXPIRE DATE: 1 DECEMBER 2......so, I SHOULD BE, and how can I show people that I would benifit the encyclopedia, if I am BLOCKED, and can only edit my page... :( I do want to benifit, but can't..... 7arazred (talk) 20:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Does not address the reasons of the block. The days you're quoting are simply the autoblock, you are blocked indefinitively, this block will not be lifted until such time as you can address the reasons that led to your block and how your behavior has since changed. Asking repeatedly for unblock without providing any reasoning as to why you should be unblocked is not helpful. Regards, Snowolf How can I help? 21:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note: there are two different blocks to consider. The IP address 193.111.221.60 (talk) was blocked for 1 month commencing 17:48, 2 November 2011 but 7arazred (talk · contribs) was blocked indefinitely at 10:02, 2 November 2011. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
7arazred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry for the disruptive editing that I did...... I understand now that I shouldn't keep re-nominating an article that I think deserves to be an Good Article if I think so, and I re-nominated the Article (Revolution Software) so much, without barely improving it, and I am sorry. I will try to benifit to Wikipedia as much as I can, and I won't cause trublle anymore. :) - And also will not sockpuppet any more! :)
Decline reason:
Interesting you bring socking up, since nobody here mentioned it... thanks for pointing me to User:Bsbass, though. Even without considering that, however, I'm not inclined to believe that you'd be a benefit to Wikipedia. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:46, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
PLEASE, UNBLOCK ME, I WILL BE GOOD FROM NOW ON! :D PLEASE, I ALLREADY AM THINKING OF SOME GOOD PAGES I COULD MAKE (FREAK OUT: EXTREME FREERIDE ETC...)
7arazred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Once again, please unblock. I mean, I have done quite some good on Wikipedia. The Article that I kept re-nominating (Revolution Software), I actually improved it (added about 25 reliable sources), and other Revolution Software related articles (like Broken Sword). I even created a few useful pages (Like Broken Sword 2.5, George Stobbart etc.). I really think that I could benifit. As I said, I have a couple 'useful' articles up my sleeve.....Please, give me another chance......PLEASE! :S - Regards, 7arazred (talk · contribs)
Decline reason:
Considering the history of messages to this talk page (which you have removed) and comments at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, it is difficult to believe that you really think that the Revolution Software Good Article issue is the only problem. You have an extensive history of unhelpful editing of various kinds. You have made no attempt to take on board the messages given to you to try to help you improve. You have several times made edits which make it difficult to assume that you have been acting in good faith. Very few of your edits have been of any substantial value. The extent to which the articles you have created are "useful" (to use your word) is at best debatable: most of the pages you have created have been deleted, and of the two articles that still remain, one is tagged for notability and original "research", and is completely unsourced, and the other does not appear to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. In summary, your editing contains a good deal which is unhelpful, very little which is helpful, and there is no evidence whatever that unblocking you would be helpful to the project. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your way forward
[edit]A brief look at your contributions shows the following significant problems:
- uploading copyrighted material
- introducing improper external links (including Facebook of all things)
- fraudulently upgrading articles status through fake GAN analysis
- utter lack of communication regarding problems or attempts to help you
- probable conflict of interest
Your best bet: follow the processes in WP:OFFER. That means no editing en.Wikipedia whatsoever - even anonymously. During that time, however, you should go back to the 5 pillars are read. Once you understand and agree to abide by those (and ALL linked policies) go to another Wikimedia project and edit constructively. Should you choose to return in a minimum of 6 months, you must stay away from all articles related to Revolution Software, broadly construed - after all, it's these topics that have led to your indefinite block. Everyone has something to add to this project: but there's a right way and a wrong way - you've gone so far down the wrong way street that you're indefinitely blocked. There is a way back - a very cautious way back. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:54, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
So that means (when I read the 5 pillars/follow the processes of WP:OFFER) I can't edit any en.Wiki Article for 6 months.... and after those 6 months (if I will be 'good'), I can return to the English Wikipedia, but without editing ANY Revolution Software-related Article??? - OK, if it is so, I will take the offer... :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7arazred (talk • contribs)
- As this is not an unblock request, I have converted it to a comment. If you can prove you have beneficial editing on another Wikimedia project, you will still have to make your "case" in six months, but the odds of being unblocked then are much much higher (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I think I can, as I know many foreign languages (Slovenian, Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian, and some German), so I will do my Best :D.
!THE NEW AND IMPROVED 7ARAZRED IS COMING!
[edit]Talk page access removed
[edit]Because you keep attempting to remove your declined unblock requests, I have removed your ability to edit this talk page. If you wish to make further unblock requests, please email them to the unblock mailing list at unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)