User talk:79.70.115.133

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.70.115.133 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This block violates the blocking policy, because I was not given even a single warning prior to this block.

Decline reason:

Please show me where in the blocking policy it says you are required to be given warnings prior to blocking. If you're not here to contribute constructively, you will be blocked. Period. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.70.115.133 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You are right, but I wish the length is shortened to 24 hours or possibly a topic ban on railways and laws because I didn't actually vandalise, I only unsuccessfully tried and therefore didn't waste the time it would take for you to revert my vandalism or upset any members of the public as none of my blatant vandalism was publicly visible, unless you bother checking filters which most people ignore. 79.70.115.133 (talk) 1:58 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Sorry, your wish will not be granted at this time. You intended to vandalize - just because you weren't successful doesn't mean you get another chance at it. TNXMan 19:16, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

79.70.115.133 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Wikipedia is stupid.

Decline reason:

Your mom. Now that we're past the immature comments, do you want to make a legitimate request before I block your talk page access? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:48, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---