User talk:75.8.213.44

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Supercar, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Mighty Antar (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

3RR

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Supercar. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Supercar, you will be blocked from editing. Resinertion of blank headers to further a POV-fork is simply not acceptable. You have been notified many times via other IP addresses. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This IP address has been blocked temporarily. Suspected sockpuppet evidence has determined that this IP address is being used abusively; the address has been blocked to prevent further abuse. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please post {{unblock|reason for unblock here}} on your talk page, with a note referencing this message. Please be sure to include the IP address (which should appear at the bottom of the block message). Administrators: Please consult with the blocking administrator who placed the block before unblocking.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

75.8.213.44 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please look carefully at my contributions, I've tried to add to the article, not revert the page. Please penalize

the other editors from making false accusations against me, I have a right to add to this article. The false accusations have to stop. Thank you very much.

Decline reason:

reason — No, you do not have such right. Moreover, your edits have not been beneficial to the article. Whether you're a returning abusive editor, or a new one unfamiliar with our policies, this block serves the interests of Wikipedia, which is the purpose of any block. Please take the time to review our policies, especially WP:V, WP:OR, and our guideline WP:COI. WP:SOCK may or may not be applicable, but the account is being used disruptively. Cool Hand Luke 04:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---