User talk:74.95.112.141

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made to List of explorers. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (74.95.112.141) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, 74-95-112-141-colorado.hfc.comcastbusiness.net (74.95.112.141), is registered to Comcast Business Communications, Colorado, ASN 7922 and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

August 2016

You have been blocked for a one-week period from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

. Neutrality^talk 01:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.95.112.141 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why block edits on all articles when you're only pissed about one? I get the idea that you're trying to work for Hillary and suppress any evidence of the Muslim Brotherhood or Islamist connections of Huma Abedin's mother despite people as high as Congress questioning her for it. I guess you are partisan and frantic. But I need to edit articles far removed from this topic, so how about fixing the ban to just this one article?

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. PhilKnight (talk) 02:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2016

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Lufthansa heist have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Lufthansa heist was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://mafia.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Lufthansa_Heist) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Reference errors on 17 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the History of tea page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to History of geology— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe _talk 23:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Per: historyscoper.com, Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 21:57, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Miles Ahead (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Congo (film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 16:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Congo (film) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Congo (film) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/stop-eating-my-sesame-cake) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

List of explorers

The person using this IP and editing the list of explorers page may want to consider registering for an account. That way you can bypass pending edit limitations and edit the article directly. I don't mind approving of the edits as they are constructive but if you get tired of making edits and having to wait for someone to ok them, think about signing up. Take care. freshacconci talk to me 15:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Finsbury Park Mosque, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Marie Corelli. Thank you. Jdcomix (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to P. F. Sloan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. hulmem (talk) 19:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is an example of the editor abuse rampant on Wiki. Adding unsourced content contravenes what bureaucratic policy, and the penalty is blocking from all editing of all articles? Why not just Google the name P.F. "Flip" Sloan and find any number of references and insert them without bugging me? Why not just put in a note for anybody to add a source at that point instead of harassment like this?

The onus is on the contributing editor to provide the source. If it's so easy to find a reliable source for this content, then do so. Thank you. Waggie (talk) 03:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waggie. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Leonard Gershe— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Waggie (talk) 03:08, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sam Bass (outlaw) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Carlo Crivelli have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Carlo Crivelli was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://idlespeculations-terryprest.blogspot.com/2007/04/carlo-crivelli-immaculate-conception.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2017

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Olavo de Carvalho have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Olavo de Carvalho was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://olavodecarvalhofb.wordpress.com/2016/01/22/curriculum-vitae-de-olavo-de-carvalho/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2017

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Grand Junction, Colorado, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Emanuel de Witte. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Your edit here to Emanuel de Witte was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://art-now-and-then.blogspot.com/2016/03/emanuel-de-witte.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:19, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Sutter, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wikipedia is never considered a reliable source. I already said in my edit summary that none of the sources I checked called him Sr. IUt does not matter what other Wikipedia articles use. Either provide reliable sources to show that he was called Sr. or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please sign and indent your posts. I didn't Google him. I looked at some of the references we use in the article. None of the ones I checked call him Sr. Please read WP:RS, and don't make comments about other editors. Meters (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Logan, Utah. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 17:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, used the wrong template at 16:55, 12 January 2018. Redone with correct one. Meters (talk) 17:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:74.95.112.141. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Meters (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at John Sutter. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to André Cornélis (1927 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to William E. Woodruff (politician). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nathan Chen, you may be blocked from editing. L293D (✉) 02:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the photo title from the incorrect Nathan Quad to Nathan Chen the Quad King. How's that vandalism? Why did you vandalize my edit to change it to plain Nathan Chen? He has earned the title of Quad King and you take it away? You are the true vandal, don't you think?

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lerone Bennett Jr.. Serols (talk) 17:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is this, a setup? You published this notice within seconds of my publishing the edit, meaning you couldn't have time to even check it out by reading the source. This was a good edit, taken from the NYT obituary. You are the vandal, and I warn you to stop.

Please note Wikipedia:Weblinks - no shop-links. --Serols (talk) 08:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No shop-links? Then why didn't you delete the link and leave the edit text alone? That's vandalism. Aren't you supposed to refrain from reverting edits until they're discussed in the talk page? I'm warning you again.

Think about what you write and pay attention to your words. --Serols (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Take your own advice.

June 2018

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Richard A. Betts have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Richard A. Betts was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/richardabetts) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Platte Canyon High School hostage crisis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Not only is that a non-reliable source (a user-generated site) the entry in question is copy of a Wikipedia entry) Meters (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Jonathan Karl. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please also read WP:BLPPRIVACY Meters (talk) 17:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Don't comment out personal information in BLPs. If it needs to be sourced and it isn't then remove it. And don't leave edit summaries claiming you are undoing someone's edit when you don't. Meters (talk) 01:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meters: Nice try covering for yourself, when you blasted me for copying the info box to the main article just because the info box had no source, but left the info box in place, which you never blasted when it was first posted by somebody else. I didn't erase it completely because source or not, it might still be correct and a source might later be uncovered. Comment out personal information? Where? Edit summaries? I didn't write any. OK, you removed it all without due process such as discussing it first on the Talk Page but I don't care that much so I'll let it go.

As for my undo of your first edit, I didn't see the content in the infobox. I saw you adding material directly in front of an existing source. The source did not support the material you added so I removed it as "not in cited source".

As for your secod edit, just how do you explain your edit summary "Undid revision 847771060 by Meters"? Here's my edit that you supposedly undid [1] and here's your edit [2]. Note that my edit was untouched, and your edit was to a completely different part of the article. The only way to get that summary is to undo my edit, and then restore it it and make your other changes before saving the edit. That's a completely deceptive and WP:POINTY edit summary. Meters (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You certainly did comment ou thte material. see the diff for your edit [3] where you commented out the birth date and added "no source?" Did you read WP:BLPPRIVACY? WUnless the birth date is "widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object" the birth date is considered private. information. We have no sources for it at all, so it certainly falls under private information. There's no need to discuss it on the talk page before removing it. We are required to remove it. Meters (talk) 04:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This IP is listed as a static IP, and it has had multiple previous warnings for similar unsourced edits. After your edit summary on the undo and your denial of the contenet of your next edit my WP:AGF is done.

Your AGF is done? Duh, first, I didn't really undo your edit, as you saw, but just added my own new edit instead. Too bad, I started out by pressing undo instead of edit, because I was going to undo it at first and add a source but after studying the sources harder realized that none were necessarily reliable but may have been mirrors of the article, although I have no way to be sure so my commenting the info you missed out and asking for somebody else to provide a source was the only logical course. I admit I forgot it started as an undo although it was a new edit, and the note wasn't for you especially. As to your original actions, sorry, but your failure to even scan the page you were vandalizing to see the same info elsewhere left unchallenged is pure carelessness, giving you no blank check to delete it, when you could have added "source needed" instead and not bother me. Ditto all my other so-called warnings for unsourced edits. This one was the most justifiable because it was just a copy of info. elsewhere in the same article, a good faith edit. Considered private? Duh, you failed to do your homework again. The birth date is splashed all over the Net on many sites, and and there's no evidence that the subject has been objecting, hence it's no longer private it's public. My comment was to other Wiki editors and was only visible to them. That was not appropriate on my first edit since I had no way of knowing if the Infobox had been vetted or was confirmed by one of the many urls cited in the article. Yes, it is proper to discuss it on the talk page before completely deleting it since it's so widely published, and hence there's still a good chance there's a source somewhere, and only after further discussion and call for sources should the date be erased, with a private comment for editors to not try to restore it unless they provide a new reliable source. Finally, if it's deleted and later a source pops up, the deletion could embarrass Wiki. But as I already said, I don't care that much and will drop it if you will.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:74.95.112.141. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Calling my removal of that unsourced personal information vandalism is a personal attack. I suggest that you read the links I have provided to you, and drop it yourself. Meters (talk) 22:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Denis Rancourt have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Denis Rancourt was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2017/02/links-to-denis-rancourts-web-pages.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:59, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2019

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at James Holzhauer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. AldezD (talk) 13:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.