User talk:74.79.217.101

The King of Kong

Thank you for editing this article. However, note that any material added to Wikipedia needs to reference a reliable source. It also needs to be written in the style of an encyclopedia.All of your additions to the article are in danger of being removed. TimidGuy (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1P6edH95LCc Here is link to the original video played on 8/16/2000 showing Mr. Sczerby playing what was at the time a WR game of Donkey Kong. This video was rebroadcast a few years ago with Mr. Sczerby himself giving commentary on it. This video is the very same video sent to Twin Galaxies in 8/2000 It shows the FULL GAME from beginning to end and it clearly beats Billy Mitchells 874k 1982 Donkey Kong with 879,200.. In your nety email reply indicating my info is not valid, please give me a link to who's in official charge of this artical so I can settle it with them. Wikipedia's description and I'm trying to help correct it for the benefits of historians everywhere. A new Donkey Kong World record at the time.

Mr. Sczerby's final score achieved on 8/16/2000 was also verified , witnessed and listed on twin Galaxies own scoreboard in 2000 as such....... years BEFORE WEBIE!. And to this day some 17 years later can STILL be referenced!

http://www.twingalaxies.com/scores.php?player=12958

Here's a link to the Twin Galaxies scoreboard clearly showing Mr. Sczerby's score of 879,200 was registered and remains to this day after nearly 17 years! This was a WR Donkey Kong game at the time a few years "BEFORE" Steve Webie is documented doing anything on Donkey Kong.

http://donkeykongforum.com/index.php?topic=304.0 This clearly shows Mr Sczerby's score of 879,200 played on 8/16/2000 This is a link to the Donkey Kong Forum, a site that tracks and keeps records on Donkey Kong and related games. There is NO ONE that forum that will deny that Timothy Sczerby was the first to officially beat Billy Mitchells 1982 Donkey Kong Score....NOT Steve Webie as falsely portrayed in the film.

Here are my reference materials and should more than make my corrections on this subject matter I've tried to include 100% valid and air tight.

Steve Webie was NOT the first to break Billy Mitchells 1982 DK score as falsely indicated in the film and in your Wikipedia article on the topic, Timothy Sczerby was the first player to do this achievement as more than well referenced by the material and sources I have provided.

Here is a link to the Donkey Kong Forum that specifically tracks all matter related to the game and its spinoffs'.

The problem is that this article is about the movie. 1) No, The problem is the movie is called a "Documentary and is not accurate in its portrayal of who did what in the game and when as far as the chronology of scoring actually occured.) ......It's not a history of Donkey Kong. 2( Your wrong on that statement as well, The movie clearly chronicles the "history" of the scoring in Donkey Kong starting from 1982. Mr. Sczerby was clearly the WR holder in that game in the year 2000......years "BEFORE" STEVE WEBIE! Your article states that Mr. Webie saw Billys 1982 874k Donkey Kong record and decided to go for it. This is factually inaccurate as Billy's score was beat by Timothy Sczerby in 2000 and no longer the #1 spot on the scoreboard at the time Mr. Webie makes that statement. THIS IS NOT DEBATEABLE IN THE CLASSIC GAMMING COMMUNITY, it is a well known fact! In a rebuttal Documentary by Dwayne Richards called "King of Con", Billy Mitchell "HIMSELF" stated that his initial 1982 Donkey Kong score was broken by Timothy Sczerby on 8/16/2000. Billy Mitchell himself made that statement!........ You can't simply interrupt the article with your explanation, 3)When it comes to my facts and the sources I have obtained them from coupled with my attempt to put an honest and well researched chronology of events to your article, it is my "responsibility" to correct the errors in your article. That is what Wipedia is for and why we are discussing this matter now. Yes, an interruption point "IS" needed to set the chronology in order....and not mislead readers of your article with inaccuracies such that it was Webie who was the first to beat Billy Mitchells 1982 Doney Kong Score.........that is simply and 100% NOT TRUE)........)as you've done. Plus, your sources are considered by Wikipedia to be primary sources. Wikipedia relies on secondary sources. You don't take primary sources of information?

I have supplied all the proof that my facts are accurate. What more do you want.

Here is the guideline for sourcing. TimidGuy (talk) 17:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Most Wikipedia editors would have immediately removed everything you've added. I've tried to guide you to better practices. You can expect your addition to be removed at some point. TimidGuy (talk) 20:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Walter Day, the founder of Twin Galaxies, is a friend of mine. I happened to run into him this evening. He said that what you're saying here is accurate. He also said he'd look for a secondary source that meets WP standards. There must be a review that talks about the factual accuracy. If a source is found, then I'll be happy to add appropriate content to the article. TimidGuy (talk) 01:51, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, I'm AntiCompositeNumber. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The King of Arcades seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 04:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

February 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The King of Kong, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The King of Kong, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The King of Kong was changed by 74.79.217.101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974458 on 2018-02-11T16:20:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello, I'm INeedSupport. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The King of Kong— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. INeedSupport^{(Care free to give me support?)} 21:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The King of Kong. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The King of Kong, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• Instead putting a rant in the Wikipedia article, please take your concerns to the article's talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:07, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The King of Kong. Wikipedia is not the place to "correct the record". If you want to post your personal analysis and opinions on this documentary, do so on a blog somewhere. Wikipedia is written according to what reliable sources say, not what editors believe to be true. Stop disrupting this article by posting contemptuous, non-neutral criticism (calling it a "so-called" documentary, for example). If your next edit to the article isn't neutrally written and well-sourced, I will ask for your editing rights to be revoked temporarily. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The King of Kong. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:32, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

You have been blocked from editing for two years for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

---