Jump to content

User talk:73.220.163.13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

October 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cellular (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to I Know What You Did Last Summer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ClueBot is a piece of software that detects and reverts what it scores as likely damaging edits. A human editor would also have reverted your additions, because they seemed to be just stating your own thoughts about how the plot was designed. But Wikipedia articles are not places for general discussion. What is wanted is factual information, and the only opinions to include are published reviews supported by references to show where they were published. So if you could try to stick to facts and published opinions, you are very welcome to carry on contributing to our articles about films: Noyster (talk), 10:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the I Know What You Did Last Summer plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Aaytha Ezhuthu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inba is an evil character who gets on everyone's nerves. It is true that Michael wanted revenge on Inba.(73.220.163.13 (talk) 02:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)).[reply]

January 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Departed— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe talk 00:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Jac16888 Talk 00:16, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I should've done this years ago. It's true that Queenan's dumb in Departed film, so why can't you accept my edits?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 00:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Am I going to get unblocked? Yes or No

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(73.220.163.13 (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand why I got Blocked for Disrupting, I won't do it again please.(73.220.163.13 (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC

Decline reason:

You have two choices; wait for the block to expire in January, or create an account. As we cannot tell whose fingers are on the keyboard these are the only options you have.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)))[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

My computer is refusing to create an account, so please allow me to create an account? (73.220.163.13 (talk) 00:51, 25 July 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

You cannot create an account yourself, but you can request an account to be created for you. Huon (talk) 01:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was told that I was going to get a password few days ago for Wikipedia account, but nothing's happening, so please find a way to let me edit Wikipedia?(73.220.163.13 (talk) 23:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

Please read Huon's comments above. You're blocked and circumventing it would be against our blocking policy. Also, please use the unblock template, not the helpme template for unblock requests. DrStrauss talk 10:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

new account

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Huon lied to me that I was able to get an account of username. Please unblock me (73.220.163.13 (talk) 10:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)).[reply]

Decline reason:

Personal attacks on other editors won't get you unblocked. It's becoming increasingly clear that you are incapable of editing in a collaborative environment like Wikipedia. Further pointless or abusive requests will result in your talk page access being revoked. Favonian (talk) 10:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2018

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jac16888 Talk 22:38, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Heyyyyyyy I never got a Warning about Being blocked Again? Unblock me Now.

Decline reason:

We are under no obligation to warn you - the previous series of blocks should have sufficed to indicate that what you were doing was not permitted. Yunshui  09:02, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

elsewhere

[edit]

There's probably a group on Reddit that would be happy to discuss movie plots with you. —Tamfang (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jac16888 Talk 16:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.220.163.13 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Nobody posted a Warning that this IP would be blocked???? (73.220.163.13 (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

Decline reason:

No warnings are required; the other notices on this page should have been sufficient. As you have not addressed the reason for the block, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.