Jump to content

User talk:70.18.93.117

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lois Duncan, has been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kuru talk 15:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Lois Duncan. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kuru talk 15:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ronald McDonald, you will be blocked from editing. Kuru talk 15:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru talk 15:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


February 2008

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jane Goodall, you will be blocked from editing. —EncMstr 15:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Emily Dickinson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --ROGER DAVIES talk 14:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to S. E. Hinton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 13:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to S. E. Hinton constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 13:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to S. E. Hinton. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Steve Crossin (talk) 13:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --ROGER DAVIES talk 14:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Mark David Chapman (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Templos. Reedy Boy 18:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Philip Pullman, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  ARTYOM  14:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]