User talk:6Shot
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. There is no doubt this user has edited under other account(s). They might want to prove us those accounts are legitimate, but until then, blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 10:43, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Wow
[edit]6Shot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
That's some great detective work there Mr. Materialscientist. Now unblock me.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 12:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Polish, Belgian?
[edit]Dear Mr. Team Argentina leader:
I might as well take the time to address something that always has bothered me in the years that I've "known" you over the internets... You say you live in Belguim and speak Polish as a first language, yet your English seems VERY, very much like that of a teenage/20's-generation American. Where did you actually grow up? Totally like in "Cali," brah? Batphone boy (talk) 16:51, 18 December 2010 (UTC)