Jump to content

User talk:69.43.88.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2005

[edit]

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --VileRage (Talk|Cont) 03:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --VileRage (Talk|Cont) 03:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --VileRage (Talk|Cont) 03:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(added 3 all at once, for vandalism on Jesus Arius and Jesus again, due to wiki slowness!) --VileRage (Talk|Cont) 03:40, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2006

[edit]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. RexNL 17:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT AN OUTLET FOR SPECULATION

[edit]

I took the liberty of removing your additions to the EVA and Sigint entries in the list of MGS3 characters articles. This is not an outlet for speculation and its against policy. Please take time to WikiProject_Computer_and_video_games Jonny2x4 22:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed undone by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 13:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warrens 20:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Los Angeles, California on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 23:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Emperor penguin. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. =Axlq 03:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during November 14 2006 (UTC) to Economy of the People's Republic of China

[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 08:49, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woodstock is a public school

[edit]

http://www.csde.state.ct.us/public/der/ssp/dist0405/dist149.pdf

The state of Connecticut has a public school profile of the school. WhisperToMe 23:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Melrose, Massachusetts. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Krellis 04:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Regarding edits made during December 13 2006 (UTC) to Jimmy Johnson (American football coach)

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Rlfb 10:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007

[edit]

January

[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Georgia (U.S. state) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Roswell native 02:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during March 27 2007 (UTC) to Emperor Penguin

[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Jespinos 06:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Duxbury, Massachusetts page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. BrianGV talk 23:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --ElKevbo 00:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


May 2007

[edit]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to The Little Drummer Girl. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Urination. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Eliz81(C) 07:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2007

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Birth-Mark. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnightLago 15:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Emmanuel College, Boston, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.emmanuel.edu/. As a copyright violation, Emmanuel College, Boston appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Emmanuel College, Boston has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. Please do not copy and paste material from other sites into Wikipedia. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Rise of Silas Lapham, you will be blocked from editing. Nburden (T) 17:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Acetic acid. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 02:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Louis-Philippe of France, you will be blocked from editing. Mlouns 01:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

December 2007

[edit]

Thank you for reverting the vandalism at Template:African American topics sidebar --CBD 17:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to July 16. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. faithless (speak) 09:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2008

[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Thomas Malthus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Poeloq (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rubber duck, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jock Boy 02:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

January 2009

[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Catholic school on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.23:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Optimum Online constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 03:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sisqó, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DiverseMentality 02:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Catholic school has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 03:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Homosexual orientation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wolfrock (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Wolfrock. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Saros136 (talk) 06:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Saros136. Trusilver 06:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Tony Fox (arf!) 06:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Hotel Rwanda, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. O Fenian (talk) 10:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Chelmsford High School. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Eugene2x-talk 02:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Driving under the influence, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Driving under the influence was changed by 69.43.88.2 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-03-04T05:58:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Aquafina. Marek.69 talk 06:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 06:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2009

[edit]

Your edits to August 16

[edit]

Dear 69.43.88.2,
Some of your edits on the page August 16 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 18:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Noel Turner. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alansohn (talk) 20:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nitrous oxide, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nitrous oxide was changed by 69.43.88.2 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-12-02T15:22:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Brownsville, Vermont, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 23:32, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. This edit that you made to the page Marsh rice rat has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. TbhotchTalk C. 03:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gardiner, Maine, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RandomAct(talk to me) 05:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to War of Nerves, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 07:25, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm James086. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Jay High School (Cross River, New York) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! James086Talk 20:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Tuskegee syphilis experiment, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. James086Talk 20:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jasmine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deli nk (talk) 20:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:43, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Maxwell Hall, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 03:50, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maxwell Hall with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 03:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doriftu. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Maxwell Hall because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Doriftu Speak Up. 03:54, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Glitter, you may be blocked from editing. Doriftu Speak Up. 04:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Whopper, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013

[edit]

Information icon In a recent edit to the page Idina Menzel, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 00:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ktr101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Four Loko because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gucci. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (talk) 03:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Jolly Rancher, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Velveeta, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 03:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Charles River boathouses may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |[[>Memorial Drive, Cambridge

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to House mouse— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fertilizer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Charles (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.43.88.2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't make any of those revisions "IE the "I like buttholes comment." I have no idea who did, but it sure as hell was not me.

Decline reason:

But we don't know who you are, do we? The edits unarguably came from this IP. If you want to be distinguishable, create an account. This block will not be removed. Any vandalism here when the block lifts will lead to an immediate re-block.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.43.88.2&oldid=1144135777"