Jump to content

User talk:67.87.71.232

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Space Jam: A New Legacy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 06:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

Hello, I'm Darren-M. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Daffy Duck, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Darren-M talk 15:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Animaniacs (2020 TV series)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Daffy Duck; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 18:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gratuitous reverts

[edit]

Based on your edit history, I notice you have a strange habit of reverting edits without explanation. I urge you to stop, or I'll have you reported for edit warring. Nincompoopian (talk) 13:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

[edit]

Stop icon Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Daffy Duck. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 18:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SpencerT•C 23:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Scorpions13256. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Scorpions13256 (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Hi there, i revent all your edit without valid reason for the removal. pls use the edit summary if you disargee on this thanks you. HurricaneEdgar 10:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zinnober9. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Merikins have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.