User talk:661590028

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:GeriReischl.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Singer.JPG. The copy called Image:Singer.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:GeriReischl.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:GeriReischl.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell ^babelfish 06:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lynne Latham, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. You may also want to review Wikipedia:SELFPUB 7 04:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lynne Latham

The article Lynne Latham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable entertainer / athlete - fails WP:ENT and WP:ATH as well as WP:N. Article creator has a COI as disclosed in his original post comments, and the WP:EL provided in this article took readers to a site which (among other things) sells books with this article's author listed first.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 7 04:46, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lynne Latham

I have nominated Lynne Latham, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynne Latham. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Polargeo (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Love to Love You Bradys

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Love to Love You Bradys, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.lovetoloveyoubradys.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charkie Phillips

The article Charkie Phillips has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable supporting dancer, does not meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 01:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC) GO AHEAD AND DELETE THE ARTICLE[reply]

Proposed deletion of Love to Love You Bradys

The article Love to Love You Bradys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 01:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC) GO AHEAD AND DELETE ARTICLE[reply]

MfD nomination of User:661590028/Linda Hoxit

User:661590028/Linda Hoxit, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:661590028/Linda Hoxit and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:661590028/Linda Hoxit during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dee Kaye

The article Dee Kaye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NACTOR and the GNG. No actual assertion of notability. Virtually no sourcing. Promotional textual elements. Most claimed credits not verified by UMDB or otherwise. No nontrivial pertinent FNews or GBooks hits. Note that this stage name has been used by multiple performers.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 02:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judy Susman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judy Susman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Susman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]