Jump to content

User talk:66.59.127.126

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (66.59.127.126) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 09:03, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacks property (December 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Rankersbo (talk) 09:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 66.59.127.126, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 09:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


AfC notification: Draft:Laver property has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Laver property. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:11, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacks property (January 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BenLinus1214 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. BenLinus1214talk 14:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jackmcbarn. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Selfridge–Conway discrete procedure without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:20, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2015

[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Selfridge–Conway discrete procedure with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 20:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laver property has been accepted

[edit]
Laver property, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacks property (February 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bluerasberry was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It actually is a good math stub, thanks for wriing and submitting, and it doesn't read at all like an essay, so the decline is confusing. But, again, thanks for the submission. MicroPaLeo (talk) 21:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacks property has been accepted

[edit]
Sacks property, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Sam Sing! 21:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]