User talk:66.241.128.169

2007

Your recent edit to Gary Jarman (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 05:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

2008

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Swordsmanship page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. John254 19:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Pls stop!!

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Aboriginal peoples in Canada. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tort, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tort was changed by 66.241.128.169 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-02-10T20:13:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Marigolds (short story) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Marigolds (short story) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Marigolds (short story). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

2011

This is the last warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
Your continued joking at Lara St. John is disruptive and considered vandalism. You may be blocked from editing Wikipedia the next time you do so. Dl2000 (talk) 02:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Rachel Kirkland, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Calabe1992 18:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elspeth Poulson, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SuperMarioMan 19:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Giant tube worm, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Klilidiplomus+Talk 13:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Hairrr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Gaius Flaminius Nepos because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hair^Talk 19:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at House of the Vettii. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 00:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm TheOriginalSoni. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dana Lyons because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:03, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Wild Duck. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Magister Mathematicae (talk) 20:13, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Emily Carr, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. A.amitkumar (talk) 17:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Dbrodbeck. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pierre Trudeau because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dbrodbeck (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Conscription, you may be blocked from editing. Dbrodbeck (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Henri Bourassa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dbrodbeck (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  DJSasso (talk) 18:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

Hello, I'm Atethnekos. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fjord because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 19:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013

Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Waste in New Zealand, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Avoided (talk) 18:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Schnitzel because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014

Hello, I'm Microchip08. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Havergal College, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. μc8 (talk) 14:59, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Havergal College with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Oxfordwang (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Ann Robertson (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Victoria Ann Robertson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 15:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello! 66.241.128.169, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 15:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Laura Secord— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 20:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Laura Secord with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dcirovic (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Mount Garibaldi seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

March 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas the Tank Engine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 18:06, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Proof—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:23, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 19:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Skingo12. An edit you recently made to Adam Becker seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Skingo12 (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of deaths and violence at the Cecil Hotel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 15:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of deaths and violence at the Cecil Hotel, you may be blocked from editing. Noah!^💬 16:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021

Hello, I'm LJF2019. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Larisa Latynina—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LJF2019 ^talk 15:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Havergal College—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

---