User talk:64.32.125.197

January 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rent-A-Girlfriend. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 184.144.128.108 (talk) 12:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Crunchyroll. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 21:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Crunchyroll. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not continue reverting at said page without gaining consensus. If you continue, you will be blocked, no questions asked. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechie: I've given the IP a very clear edit summary telling them to gain consensus on the talk. It's their choice whether to listen or not. 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 22:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Chicdat I know, it's just a stern warning from me so they know others clearly disapprove of this as well. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 22:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This explains why the administrator of this site configured the settings for pending changes to the page that prevent IPs from making those changes, which include me, knowing that an editor continues to remove the fields from the infoboxes whose objetive is directed to service articles, streaming services, parent companies, production studios and animation studios of different brands which are owners of different or such conglomerates despite the fact that I had recently reported and have not responded to that request corresponding to this dispute, the rule of three reversions in which I was the subject of you, in short, if I have left several summaries of editions where they tell you not to remove it and not to add those fields of ownership and parent companies to this infobox, he didn't listen to me and do whatever he wins it. 64.32.125.197 (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply is partially unintelligible. Please do not take pending changes restriction as an attack to IP editors; there are many good faith ones.

However - your reply does not address your edit warring. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 03:16, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.