User talk:61wi17

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61wi17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I want to be unblocked, I am really sorry for my mistake, I am new in Wikipedia and that's why I created a mistake, I sent a ticket for unblock my account with : d7a79d4da6a261de5f4721737aa3292a I need to be unblocked because I want to write and edit articles for myself, my team & everyone, I know and I understand the reason of my blocked from admins, but I need my account thank you for understanding.

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand our policies and guidelines. In particular, it sounds like you plan to write articles about yourself, your team, and your company. Yamla (talk) 10:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61wi17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, i want to be unblocked because i want to write so many articles

Decline reason:

You demonstrate no understanding of how you came to be blocked nor what you will do to prevent it in the future. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61wi17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello ! i want to be unblocked because i want to write articles in the future, I'm sorry for that, I'm new in Wikipedia so i wrote an article for my company and i used some text that those can advertise my company, but I did not want my company to be advertised, i used those text for my company and I did not know that it was going to be a advertising text because i did not read the "Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia", so I'm really sorry for that and i promise i will read "Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia" for anything on Wikipedia, so after that, i published my article twice with that text then i blocked for spam and absolutely advertising.

Decline reason:

That you had been told in clear English not to remove the declined unblock requests once already, then did so again, raises too many concerns about your ability to interact with guidance in the future and thus avoid issues. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, you ARE NOT ALLOWED TO REMOVE DECLINED UNBLOCK REQUESTS. Lavalizard101 (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #97291

is open. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Courtesy notification that we wish to restore talk page access. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring talk page access. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:30, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61wi17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree that I did spamming and advertising and I agree that I did a wrong thing, I regret it now and I'm sorry for it, I learned from my mistakes and I promise to don't repeat them again, also I agree all of wikipedia rules and agreements, now I know what is wikipedia! I need to be able to use Wikipedia again so I can write new articles & edit articles perfectly (Not like past) to serve humanity, I can make major and minor constructive edits and writings like adding references from official and valid sources, Adding images, sounds, and videos, or minor edits like fix grammar to provides the most useful information in a concise logical text. 61wi17 (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I do not believe you have a sufficient grasp of core content policies and related guidelines to contribute effectively here at this time. Before making another unblock request, I recommend productively contributing to other language versions of Wikipedia or to other online encyclopedias, and familiarizing yourself with WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, and WP:V. Your unblock statement should probably address these and past concerns. Providing an example edit per {{2nd chance}} would be helpful as well. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23: is it okay with you if I decline per {{2nd chance}}? voorts (talk/contributions) 00:37, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

voorts, I don't see why we would want to unblock this user. I'm not happy with the fact that they want to create articles, let alone edit them. In addition to their demonstrated poor judgment, I don't think they're sufficiently competent to edit Wikipedia. now I know what is wikipedia! I need to be able to use Wikipedia again so I can write new articles & edit articles perfectly (Not like past) to serve humanity?--Bbb23 (talk) 00:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: I could offer a WP:CONDUNBLOCK to only create pages through AfC submission. If the editor starts spamming again, I will block them as soon as I become aware of it. Of course, that would be contingent on them completing the 2nd chance exercise and showing that they are competent. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I done whatever told in guide, I said it clear:

Understand what you did and why you have been blocked (I agree that I did spamming and advertising and I agree that I did a wrong thing, I regret it now and I'm sorry for it, I learned from my mistakes and I promise to don't repeat them again)

Give a good reason for your unblock (I need to be able to use Wikipedia again so I can write new articles & edit articles perfectly (Not like past) to serve humanity, I can make major and minor constructive edits and writings like adding references from official and valid sources, Adding images, sounds, and videos, or minor edits like fix grammar to provides the most useful information in a concise logical text.)

Stick to the point

I wasn't rude and insult no one, I did not threaten anyone, I talked about myself, I told you that i don't do it again! I don't know what can I say more to be unblocked for A wrong thing I did. 61wi17 (talk) 01:10, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to write and edit like before I get blocked. 61wi17 (talk) 01:15, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@61wi17, do you have any specific articles you want to edit, or specific new articles you want to create? Or do you just want to be able to edit in general? -- asilvering (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be able to edit and create new articles in general, but there are two specific categories that I can do my best, culture and the arts & people and self;

For culture and the arts: video games, music and celebrity.

For people and self: entertainment, musical groups, singers and company.

Thank you for asking. 61wi17 (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What companies do you want to write about? What sources would you use to write about a company? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:18, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Companies that operate on entertainment, technology & services.

Examples ▼

Entertainment: Red Barrels, Spotify, Netflix, Blizzard.

Technology: Sony, Apple, Razer & HTC.

Services: Microsoft, Chat-GPT & Adobe.

I'll use their official website, official social media (like YouTube), blogs, or news websites that have official references (like IGN for video games or IMDB for movies and TV shows) as sources. 61wi17 (talk) 02:02, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is not a reliable source per WP:IMDB. Additionally, usually, Wikipedia editors use secondary sources to verify information.

Another question: what secondary sources would you use to write about Chat-GPT? voorts (talk/contributions) 02:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll use reviews, documentary, research analysis & reports as secondary sources. 61wi17 (talk) 02:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide links to a reliable scholarly article, a reliable newspaper article, and any other reliable source about ChatGPT that are not already used as references in the Wikipedia article ChatGPT and explain why they are reliable. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ChatGPT is a tough one to edit for new editors like me because ChatGPT services are clear & Wikipedia editors did their best, so I think we should talk about other ChatGPT topics or we should wait to see what world goes to edit ChatGPT article about services, I don't think there are new things to edit and add right now because too many editors worked on ChatGPT article, but I can research and do my best if you only accept this, or we can talk about another company. 61wi17 (talk) 02:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@61wi17, are you a native speaker of a language other than English? You aren't blocked on other Wikipedia editions, so you can edit Wikipedia in some other language if so. -- asilvering (talk) 03:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me, but I have no desire to edit and create articles in other languages. 61wi17 (talk) 03:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And forgot to say: Products that they released physically in the market or on official known platforms. 61wi17 (talk) 02:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

voorts, every word the user writes demonstrates incompetence.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, there is anything that I can help? 61wi17 (talk) 00:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]