User talk:5ana1234

The Great Father gross

Hi there, re: this, you should seek consensus via discussion on the talk page for the inclusion of The Great Father in the list of Malayalam films at this time, as another editor, Jupitus Smart has expressed concern that the data is coming from the producers. Also, The News Minute doesn't strike me as a sufficient reference per WP:UGC. Who runs it? Who are the editors? What makes them experts in Indian film finances? If your edit is reverted, please do not resubmit the content without first establishing consensus to do so. Note that Wikipedia has no deadline, so if we have to wait a little bit to get believable gross reports from multiple sources, then we should do so. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:01, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm Hammersoft. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mohanlal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Commercial failure" and WP:NPOV

Hi there, re: this, please avoid describing things in subjective absolutes. "Failure" is not tone appropriate for an encyclopedia. Neither is "super hit" or "epic flop" or "all-time blockbuster status" or "100 crore club" or any of that crap. Content at Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view, not written like a gushing fanboy or a snarky blogger. Additionally, summarising a film as commercially unsuccessful without providing any useful context like its gross, or its budget, etc. doesn't really seem helpful. The encyclopedia prefers objective data over subjective data. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Your addition to The Great Father has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1] Content you added can be found verbatim here. It should be common knowledge that you can't copy text from place A and paste it into academic work B. Plagiarism is another form of theft. It is academically dishonest and lazy and is despised pretty much everywhere in academia, and it will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. All prose content must be written from scratch in your own words. There are some exceptions, like when we utilise quotations, but those are done in small amounts and with legitimate justification of fair use, and must be formatted with quote marks and accompanied by references. This, however, is not relevant in this situation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:20, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ghilli gross

Hi there, re: this, where in this reference does it indicate that the gross of Ghilli was 50 crore? I would appreciate an explanation, please. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:06, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I found the source this reference clearly has the statement "Ghilli was the first film to cross the Rs 50 crore mark in the history of Tamil cinema.". This can be seen in the fourth slide in the slide show of [2] . Thank You, 5ana1234 (talk) 11:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]