User talk:564dude

Welcome!

Hello, 564dude, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nick-D (talk) 00:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

564dude (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

564dude (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Limmerick007". The reason given for Limmerick007's block is: "Vandalism".

Blocking administrator: Tide rolls (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Autoblock #2211031 lifted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:59, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! What did you do here?

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=John_Carroll_(journalist)&curid=13010813&diff=464314778&oldid=437782295. Sorry, I don't understand what you did. Thanks for helping! GeorgeLouis (talk) 08:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I tidied up the reference list, as it contained some of the in-text reference numbers as well as the references. I moved the <ref name> tags to the text so that the reference numbers wouldn't appear in the References. I forgot to remove the {{citation style}} maintenance template - will do that now. Hope that explains my edit 564dude (talk) 04:19, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Dexter White

re: Uncited Svetlana Chervonnaya reference commented out) Could you enlighten me as to what happened here? DEddy (talk) 01:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reference to a page on documentstalk.com by Svetlana Chervonnaya was in the reference list, but wasn't cited in the article. Discussion on the talk page suggested that it wasn't a reliable source, so rather than adding it back into the article I marked it as a comment. This way it's still part of the page but doesn't show up as a broken reference (I was working through the "Pages with incorrect ref formatting" category and this article was listed there). If you think it should be deleted instead, I don't mind if you do that. 564dude (talk) 02:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer that it be included as a reference. I find it rather odd that a website with relevant information on this contentious topic is excluded since it's a website. By that sort of "reasoning" Wikipedia should be excluded. DEddy (talk) 20:06, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing full citations

Why are you removing the full citations such as in this edit [1]? We typically leave them filled in. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:51, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally if you could revert all these shortenings that would be appreciated. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have no preference about the citation style, but if someone uses a full citation, I do agree that it is best to leave it like that. Also - you certainly got active on Wikipedia suddenly. Thanks for your contributions; we always like librarians around. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.

Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
Get involved in some of our special projects:
- Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
- Help develop a template for citing archival collections
- Write guides to accessing and using library resources

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Australia Zoo

Hi 'Dude'. This was a good edit here. But if you had looked back in the edit history then you would have seen the (unexplained) deletion of sourced content that caused the citation errors you fixed, here. These sort of errors are frequently caused when 'list based' references are used and the editor deleting content doesn't bother to preview/or check for such errors.
• I have restored the content (and sources) here, and intend to copy edit the page a bit so it fits in. 220 of ^Borg 01:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 564dude. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PMC format fix no longer necessary

Hi, regarding this edit, the citation templates were updated earlier this year to allow formats of |pmc=PMC123 or |pmc=123, so such edits are no longer necessary. Thanks Rjwilmsi 16:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 564dude. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a Citation Monitor

564Due--How does one cite a chapter in an edited book, while identifying the editors---aside from my improvised method showing here?:

Messerschmidt, Manfred (2000). "Forward Defense: The "Memorandum of the Generals" for the Nuremberg Court". In Hannes Heer; Klaus Naumann, eds. (eds.). War of Extermination: The German Military in World War II. New York: Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-57181-232-2. {{cite book}}: |editor2= has generic name (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)

The reason you see eds. at the end of Klaus Naumann is so that people do not confuse them as the authors of the book, when they were its editors. Despite writing their own chapters in this example volume, most of the chapters are written by someone else. Show me how to do it so that they are reflected as editors. BTW -- what you did to the Bandenbekämpfung page does NOT solve this dilemma, so it was reverted. Also, you should note that in no way does this interfere with the citation's tag so that it directs to it when clicked.--Obenritter (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 564dude. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 564dude. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Open access signalling

Hi!

Thanks for adding references to articles, as in this edit and flagging them as open access. Did you know that the citation templates have parameters such as |doi-access=free to flag which source the article is open access from? This helps readers who are not familiar with bibliographic identifiers find a free copy easily. Soon this will also auto-generate a |url= to link the title of the work itself.

Keep up the good work! − Pintoch (talk) 20:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]