User talk:548641810B

548641810B, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 548641810B! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Pornography laws by region

Hello, I reverted your edits to the above article because they did not appear accurate to cited sources. In the US porn can only be banned if it is found to be “obscene” by the Miller Test which has practically never happened in the last several years, meaning it’s functionally legal in almost all cases; in the UK the laws are more convoluted but generally speaking pornography is de facto legal unless it is considered “extreme” by censors (which is admittedly a very broad category, but not so broad as to be considered completely banned). Dronebogus (talk) 02:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion concerning your behavior at the Administrators’ noticeboard

See: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:548641810B_keeps_adding_incorrect_legal_information_to_Pornography_laws_by_region

Dronebogus (talk) 21:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

548641810B (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Second account for testing purposes and other legitimate projects. First account blocked for being too similar to an existing account name.548641810B (talk) 22:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clear violation of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 22:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.