User talk:50.81.237.112

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Hopeman and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! TheBritinator (talk) 20:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edits to Wye and Horning

I don't know why you don't use an account, but thanks for all those edits. Ed1964 (talk) 14:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As one of the caring IP's I'm able to perform the much-needed service that account holders rarely seem to do!

If you look back at Horning, some of the horrible self-sourcing was done by a very experienced account holder (over 21,000 edits). I'll never understand how something like that slips through unaddressed. 50.81.237.112 (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits and I am sorry you get reverted by users with scripts who fail to give any attention to the edits in question. It has happened to me long after I became an 'established user' although IPs do bear the brunt of that. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	IPs rarely get barnstars but you've been doing an awesome job at deleting bias and spam. Thanks! نوح^فث ^{Let's Chat!} 20:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Thanks. I wish there was more cleanup going on. I'm getting tired! 50.81.237.112 (talk) 20:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just like to clarify that you are not the one I am actually reporting but as the one account who has closely interacted with the account in question I believe it would be in your interest to air your side also. Borgenland (talk) 13:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Synorem. I noticed that in this edit to Larkinville, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Synorem (talk) 21:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you fail to read the clearly-written edit summary? 50.81.237.112 (talk) 21:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - Huggle keybind slip perhaps. Many apologies. Synorem (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts in removing pesky promotional spam! Parksfan1955 (talk) 14:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the nice recognition. 50.81.237.112 (talk) 14:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Adamantine123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adamantine123 (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you putting back in an old self-sourced and directory-sourced PROMOTIONAL SHOPPING DIRECTORY? 50.81.237.112 (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you also fail to notice that the Unsourced and very poorly-sourced Retail Promotions had hijacked the LANDMARKS section of the community's article? 50.81.237.112 (talk) 18:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because they didn't look, I think. Drmies (talk) 21:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why Admantine123 even considered reinstating the self sourced directory promo in Socorro, Quezon City. Ed1964 (talk) 18:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for weighing in. Neither do I. And he/she is also being unresponsive. 50.81.237.112 (talk) 18:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamantine123, it is customary when informing someone of a revert that you link to what was actually reverted. As others have previously mentioned, I am not sure why you saw it appropriate to revert someone fixing promotional content, it was most definitely not unconstructive. This is a poor display. TheBritinator (talk) 18:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bedgrove

You left the "S" off of restaurants. I added it. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 20:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. My cursor has been acting up so I'm going to do a restart. 50.81.237.112 (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jannatulbaqi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Balnain have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Baqi:) (talk) 15:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Doctormora

hello, it seems we disagree on the content of the article. Why do you believe the info you removed hijacks the article? It seems to me it is simply stating the contributions to the town from other characters besides the founder. It's not getting personal or off topic imo, there's a line that seems to imply it's only focusing on those who made a contribution not on the founders family so idk why you'd think we should remove that. I think we should change the subtitle because it makes it seem like the characters of that section are only there because they're related to the founder which would make your statement true but that's not the case. What you think? AlessandroMillioti87 (talk) 01:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm going to trust the judgement and input of the far more experienced editors who have weighed in. 50.81.237.112 (talk) 03:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.