User talk:4thgenTPA

December 2016

Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Seminole Heights, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

4thgenTPA, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 4thgenTPA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Seminole Heights. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

—————————

The edits were completely constructive. They show the source of the fake Seminole Heights two-headed gator seal. I find it funny, but it's not factual. Wikipedia relies on edits for truth, not for spreading misinformation. And cutting out the source of such information completely is allowing misinformation to propagate.

Notability

That bit does not meet notability. Don't restore it. References or not. Jim1138 (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

———————

I've restored the image. If the information about the hoax isn't "notable" the reference images certainly are. They are of interest to residents certainly. As this page has been quoted recently to justify this fake seal it is certainly notable information.

September 2017

Your recent editing history at Seminole Heights shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 16:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not engaged in an edit war. I have made intermediary changes to my content which keeps being reverted. I have provided source material to satisfy my edits. I have access to the original yearbook that does not reference the Seminole Heights Seal. The claim is that the image is shown in the 1912 Hillsborough High School yearbook but it does not appear there. The image of the seal has been faked and I checked the school's archive to prove that hypothesis.