User talk:4five
The Conference Call
[edit]Now here's a thing. The conference call is a phenomena that is sweeping the business world. A concept whereby you can invite far too many people to a meeting. You can forget who you've invited and end up talking in a derogatory fashion about people you have forgotten you have invited, thinking you'd forgotten to invite them. It turns out they were there all the time and you may as well forget to invite them in future.
In some areas it is known as the Party Line. Clearly the conference calls that I'm invited to are so far removed from a party that I appear to be in an alternate universe where balloons haven't even been invented yet.
There's the "willing contributor". They know how to speak. Everyone on the call knows they know how to speak. Just they don't know how to stop speaking. When you're faced with a virtual room full of people who you are pretty convinced aren't paying you any attention, should you ramble on in order to fill the silence or take the silence as wholehearted agreement and button it.
Next there's the "unwilling contributor". This guy doesn't volunteer any information. He'll provide only one word answers when forced into a corner.
Finally there's the "non-contributor". He attends, speaks his name, often as an early arrival to the call so no-one knows he's even there. Having made no contribution except costing your business for his time, he leaves the meeting at the end [after all the actions have been shared out between the unwilling contributors by the willing ones]. "Joe has now left the conference"........"Joe who?" Everyone asks.
This one is going to run and run, so I'll leave it for now and keep coming back to it.
File permission problem with File:Telegraph Island2.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Telegraph Island2.jpg, which you've attributed to Gary Holmes. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)