User talk:4Jays1034

Hello, 4Jays1034 and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Beagel (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Edit Summary

Hello, useful little box, such that when you make an edit you tell the rest of us; remove extraneous comma would do and we would trust that you have done so and not spend time checking your edit. Cheers Crusoe8181 (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, will do. 4Jays1034 (talk) 01:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysia

Your "grammar correction" did the following:

Changed consists of to comprises - that's not a correction - both are correct.
Changed thirteen to 13 - that's not a correction either.
Broke the wikilink by moving the 's' in states outside the link.

It's great you look for corrections to make, but you might want to check before reverting again on WP:GA articles that there wasn't a good reason it had been reverted, and that there is actually any point to the edit. Thanks. Begoon ^talk 17:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I look at your contributions I see you've made a whole series of edits changing "consists of" to "comprises". It's unnecessary, and in some cases wrong - such as: here where you've basically broken the text. Please don't make unnecessary changes like this. Begoon ^talk 17:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not to pile on, but I just came here because I noticed the same pattern. There's another editor here that has a preference for "comprise" and has gone around fixing places where it was mis-used, but I believe they were discouraged from (and correctly ceased) changing existing "consist"/"compose" usage to "comprise". In most cases, they are equivalent. "Comprise" is probably the least known of the words among people with limited English vocabularies, and should therefore be avoided in favor of the more commonly understood terms (unless you can establish consensus to the contrary somewhere). Thanks. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 18:06, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

Why are you removing commas before dates? SLBedit (talk) 02:29, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commas after introductory clauses

Please stop removing commas after introductory clauses that provide dates (e.g., "In 1989, something happened") with an edit summary of "Fixed grammar". Grammar calls for that comma to be there. Please feel free to check any manual of style for verification. In the meantime, please stop now, as I note other editors have asked you to explain your actions without a response. General Ization ^Talk 17:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 4Jays1034. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI or a WP:Block

Keep up your grammar "fixes" after all the warnings you have received, and you will be taken to WP:ANI and/or WP:Blocked. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm MadGuy7023. An edit that you recently made to Woodstock seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MadGuy7023 (talk) 22:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 23:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 23:46, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

4Jays1034 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I have been blocked and would like to be "reinstated." A combination of ignorance of the rules and my failure see the many warnings I was given, led to the block. I have revised my editing style and fully understand the rules. I apologize to those who have been negatively affected by my actions. Please allow me to continue reviewing and editing articles, I will not disappoint you. Additionally, I have changed my notifications preferences and added my new email address to my profile. This way, I will be able to proactively respond to administrator inquires. Thank you. 4Jays1034 (talk) 18:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you succinctly state what the issues with your prior editing style were and how you will avoid repeating them? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I got into the (bad) habit of removing commas from certain introductory clauses. For example, I felt that “In 1979, the book was released in the United States,” should be written as, “In 1979 the book was released in the United States.” I understand my edits in this regard were incorrect. I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia editing guidelines and will not repeat these errors. 4Jays1034 (talk) 01:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"proactively respond"

Sorry, no. Any discussion about your editing will take place on Wikipedia and not via email. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thank you. 4Jays1034 (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will my unblock request be reviewed? 4Jays1034 (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]