User talk:49TL/Archive/April 2006

This is a talk page archive for Xy7. Please do not edit this page. To leave a message, please see the current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Enquiry if your able to do this

I was looking at the Muhammad article, and on the dicussion page it has been said that the article has been taken off the good article list. Could you look into this, and tell me why? Maybe i could contribute to getting it back onto the good article lits as i think it certainly is very good.

Thanks four time, Aadamh (my keyboard doesnt do those swigily lines for sum reason) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aadamh (talk • contribs)

Question

Hi FireFox. I wanted to ask your permission to use your RFA thanks to thank the supporters of my RFA regardless of the final outcome. I found it while searching the userspace for a thanks template, and I liked yours. The draft of the template is here. Just let me know if I can use it after the RFA ends.

Thanks!--Adam ^(talk) 14:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Aadamh

Hi FierFox , have you read my previous message yet? Aadamh 17:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for semi-protection

Hello, could you please semi-protect the Apple Macintosh page? It needs semi-protection.

--BDWill Talk Contribs 05:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Message

oops wrote in wrong spot.

nice work you do there buddy, keep it up.

peace, david. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.61.154.159 (talk • contribs)

RfA

Hey FireFox, just a reminder, please remember to update the tally after voting. It isn't much, but it helps a bit in the counting. Thanks, --Jay(Reply) 20:11, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template idea for Esperanza's "Trading Spaces"

How about we have anyone who wants their userpage improved add a template or something? I have a basic model, created in one of my usersubpages under {{User:Ikiroid/PimpMyPage}}:

What do you think? It still needs a lot of help.--The i kiroid (talk/parler/hablar/paroli/说/話) 23:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hello 49TL/Archive/April 2006: Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 77/3/0. I hope I can perform at the standards expected for administrators. If I make any mistakes, or you need anything, please let me know. Prodego ^talk 01:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi FireFox. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 03:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

82.194.62.23

Before blocking 82.194.62.23 in future please note:

Attention:

This IP address, 82.194.62.23, is registered to BATELCO (ISP owned by Bahrain Telecommunications Company) and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact BATELCO (ISP owned by Bahrain Telecommunications Company) to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

82.194.62.22 05:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza newsletter

Hi Firefox. Can you please add me to the list of recipients of your Esperanza newsletter. Thank you. --67.77.201.22 17:03, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot2

It looks like it timed out, and in re-getting the pages, it used an old version. I think this is a pretty bug, but I will address it when I get a sec. joshbuddy^talk 18:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prince article

Hello Firefox. My username is JediCarlos and my IP address is 158.97.80.160. I added the Trivia section and at least one other user besides me has added information to this Section as can be seen in 06:17, 4 April 2006 Matharvest m (→Trivia - formatting). Any idea why the Trivia section is being deleted? Is there anything we can do about it so the Trivia section does not get deleted again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.97.52.43 (talk • contribs)

Keeping you informed

Hello Firefox. My username is JediCarlos. Ericorbit left me this message:

Hello JediCarlos. Regarding the Prince page, there is currently a question about whether the trivia section has relevence to that article. Please do not re-add that section without first contributing to the Prince Discussion page. Thanks. -- eo 18:15, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

I replied Ericorbit with this message:

Hello Ericorbit. My username is JediCarlos. I have read the message you sent me and I would like to know if you can help me since I don't know how I can contribute to the Prince Discussion page to talk about the Trivia Section. Do I need to create a new section? Any advice you can give me? Thanks!

I would like to know Firefox if I am doing the things correctly. Thanks!

Help!

I've been faked! Third time this week! (User:Swiftoak is a nogood gay ass inuit nerd). Can yuo block him. Thanks Swiftoak 20:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. --GraemeL ^(talk) 20:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing article

Hello Firefox. My username is JediCarlos.

Ericorbit sent me this message:

Hi JediCarlos, I assume you know how to view a discussion page (the "discussion" tab located at the top of any article). Once there, you can edit a discussion page the same way you would edit any other article... put your text below the part you want to respond to. Just make sure you sign any comments you make with four tildes 158.97.52.43 20:42, 5 April 2006 (UTC) and this will automatically append your name to the comments so people know who left it. You may also want to check the "history" tab to look at the "edit summary" text that people use when editing a page. With regard to Prince, there was a question about the validity of the "trivia" section as the contents seemed rather vague and need further explanation. This is why your addition was repeatedly removed - as you kept adding it without contributing to the coversation. Feel free to leave any comments there and all editors can come to a conclusion about the trivia. -- eo 20:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question Firefox. Before I proceed as Ericorbit has told me, I guess I need to wait until the block for username JediCarlos and/or IP address 158.97.80.160 expires 18:14, 6 April 2006 right? Thanks

date/time.

How did you get the date/time on the top of your screen, which part of your monobook allows this? Thanks. — nath a nrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 22:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if you're watching, but I replied on my talk too. — nath a nrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 17:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

File:1000000eme.jpg

Yet another sysop rolls off the conveyor belt, thanks you for your help, and excuses himself for a few days while he practices his new abilities. Back in action soon! -- Hoary 10:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks on me

Thanks for the warning to Orcsun. But I'm afraid he wrote another page about me under a different login (but I suspect the IP should be the same). It was Softia, now has been deleted. I doubt that he will stop any time soon.--Konstable 11:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam message from MiszaBot

File:SpamInACan.jpgThis is a spam message from the friendly Misza13's spam bot! This message carries virtually no information, so please feel free to delete it altogether.

Webpage information

Hello Firefox. I would like to add the following information to the Official sites subsection of the External links section in the Prince article:

www.emale.com Now links to NPG Music Club - Prince's official site, but originally it had another information. This webpage is mentioned in the song Emale from CD number 2 of the Album Emancipation (1996).

Is it ok if I do this? Waiting for your response before doing so. Thanks!

JediCarlos 18:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Webpage of January 9, 1998

Hello Firefox. I would like to add the following information

Love 4 One Another Now links to NPG Music Club - Prince's official site, but originally it said in its main webpage: welcome to the playground of the new power generation: the definitive place of gathering 4 all who love life, love God, lovesexy...a place where music, poetry and positive vibes can be shared freely without fear of retribution and every page offers a new awakening...a collective conscience of unity, love and truth so great every human will want 2 join. This site is the bginning of a webwide effort 2 change the vibration of the world...love 4 one another, the ticket... live, the ride... dig if u will a venture inside.

Again, I guess it is ok if I do this and waiting for your response before doing so. Thanks!

JediCarlos 19:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two different Domain Names in DNS (Domain Name System)

I see your point of view. But domain names npgmusicclub.com and love4oneanother.com have different administrative and technical contacts in the WHOIS database. Originally this webpages had different information (including www.emale.com) and I saw when they were linked to npgmusicclub.com so my point of view is that they should be included since originally they were different webpages.

What do you think of this explanation? Waiting for your response. Thanks!

JediCarlos 19:45, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information

I understand. I am going to add it now and wait to see what happens. If another user deletes it, then I will try the Prince Discussion Page and not add it again until we get a consensus.

I will ask for your help Firefox to see how to reach a verdict though. Could you help me with that? Waiting for your response. Thanks!

JediCarlos 20:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #2

Barnstar Brigade
The Barnstar Brigade is a new program aimed at giving more very deserving yet unappreciated users barnstars. It will officially start on 2006-04-09, but signing up is encouraged before this date: "Here in Wikipedia, there are hundreds of wikipedians whose work and efforts go un-appreciated. One occasionally comes across editors who have thousands of good edits, but because they may not get around as much as others, their contributions and hard work often go un-noticed. Sadly, these editors often leave the project. As Esperanzians, we can help to make people feel appreciated, be it by some kind words or the awarding of a Barnstar. A project the size of Wikipedia has thousands of editors, so there are plenty of people out there who deserve recognition, one just has to find them. The object of this program is not to flood editors with Barnstars, but to seek out people who deserve them, and make them feel appreciated."
Stress Alerts
The Stress alerts program aims at identifying users who are stressed, alerting the community of thier stress and works in tandem with the Stressbusters at trying to identify causes of stress and eliminating them.
Information
Welcome to the second issue of the new format Esperanza Newsletter - we hope you still like it! This week, it was delivered diligently by our new dogsbody. MiszaBot (run by Misza13): any execution complaints should go to him. Content comments should be directed at the Esperanza talkpage. Thanks!

The last AC meeting (full log)
The next elections: Approval voting as before and, also as before, an previous leadership member can run. Please submit your name for voting in the relevant section of this page. Voting starts on 2006-04-23 and ends on 2006-04-30. There will be three places up for grabs as KnowledgeOfSelf is leaving Wikipedia. Please see the previously linked page for full details. The Code of Conduct is now ready for extensive discussion! Specific comments should go to the Code of Conduct talk page, discussion of having one at all should be directed to the main Esperanza talk page. The current process for accepting proposals for new programs has been deemed fine. All Advisory Council members and the Admin Gen are to endevour to be bold when viewing discussion. If they feel that consensus has been reached, they will act accordingly.
A plea from the editor...
The propsed programs page is terribly underused! Please leave any comments, good or bad, on the page, to help us determine the membership's thoughts on the ideas there.
Signed...
Celestianpower, JoanneB, Titoxd, KnowledgeOfSelf and FireFox 19:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retail Store

Hello Firefox. Just letting you know that I will add the following information to the Official sites subsection of the External links section in the Prince article:

1 800 NEW FUNK Now links to the NPG Retail Store, but originally it existed as an independent webpage. Here you can buy many Prince related stuff.

Thanks!

JediCarlos 20:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh noes, my girlfriend is a man!

Thanks. Sceptr e ^(Talk) 14:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Legality

I believe that there is a page that needs addressing. It discusses bypassing certain registries on Windows Genuine Advantage and it gives explicit details. I don't think that Wikipedia needs the reputation of showing how to hack windows. Please consider deleting the circumvention section and keeping them from starting it up again. The site can be found here, Windows Genuine Advantage. thanks -- Damien Vryc e

A note

Come over to my talk page please? I've left something there for you to read. --HappyCamper 15:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recording Studio

Good Morning Firefox. Even though the website www.paisleyparkstudios.com is already mentioned in the section Purple Reign: 1982-1993 of the Prince article, it is my best opinion that this link should also be mentioned and included in the Official sites subsection of the External links section of the article; something like this:

Paisley Park Studios Opened in 1987 by Prince. The website was created on November 1999.

I would like to know your opinion. Waiting for response. Thanks!

JediCarlos 16:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin software bug?

Your talk page has somehow been added to my watch list, apparently as a result of whatever you did to reverse the unauthorized move of Jimbo's name in other languages page. I'm not complaining, but thought you'd want to know of this possible bug. The vandal's talk page was also added to my watch list, and possibly others'. Coyoty 19:58, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, I see what happened! When the vandal redirected Jimbo's name page to his talk page, his talk page and user page got transfered to my watchlist. When he then redirected your user page to his, your user page got transfered to my watchlist as well.

Coyoty 01:40, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:204.108.193.171 ignoring your warnings

Hi there. You gave this guy a warning the other day and he is still at it. He vandalized Nuclear Reactions twice today. Being a newbie I don't know how/don't have authority to block anybody, nor do I know the "proper authorities," so I'm telling you. --MrFizyx 20:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I mean Nuclear reactions lowercase r.

thanks for the support

Hi Firefox- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, (barely) successful rfa. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! --He:ah? 22:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kusma's RfA

Hello, FireFox! Thank you for your support in my recent successful request for adminship. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalise

I hope that you don't mind that I took the Vandalise idea and code onto my userpage. --eddie 20:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi

i was wondering if you knew who moderates the 'good articles' list . Is there one person?

Please reply back.

Thanks for you help firefox.

--Aadamh 12:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saw 3

Hey, what did I did in Saw 3? I put some trivia notes to the Saw 3 page and that's it. A person BEFORE me erased the dedication to Greg Hoffman and I EDITED it to put that back. I also put some trivia notes in the Saw 3 page. Why can't I put trivia notes. I mean I could put it in any other article but not Saw 3? Why? I won't edit until you let me so what will you say? Cigammagicwizard 14:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scary Movie 4

You said stop vandilizing. Well I added a castmember who is in this movie. I found another castmemeber again. So are you mistaking me for someone else? Cigammagicwizard 14:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry. I FORGOT to erase it from the OTHER person who put it in. Again, I'm sorry I didn't see that. Cigammagicwizard 14:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Is there a quick way to add the edit summary for vandalism or do you have to type it in manually if you're not an admin?—GH 16:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what should I do should I need to revert a page now that I've inserted the code into the monobook?—GH 16:20, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, for the code, is it <\/SCRIPT> or </SCRIPT>?—GH 16:34, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does the script revert an edit by an ip to the previous edit by another ip? It doesn't seem to function if the previous edit was done by an ip instead of a User.—GH 18:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help!—GH 18:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising on user pages

Re User:Trustpharma06, cf User:Rooms2book - both with one edit. I believe this policy covers it. rgds. -- Linkspamremover 16:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

209.204.112.73

The vandalism you "last warninged" this IP about on April 3 continues -Syberghost 15:24, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HEY : need ur help

I have a page : DALMO. Its very new , and i want to make it 'professional' like the other pages to meet wikipedia standards, and improve wikipedia as a whole. I need to make a contents page for different sections of the article and would also like to rename the article as ' Daru-Al-Moameneen' and make it possible so that if someone types 'DALMO' then wikipedia will redirect the person to the Daru-Al-Moameneen' page. Thank you for your help in advance.

REALLY appreciate it.

--Aadamh 17:16, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS ALOT FIREFOX!!

--Aadamh 17:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ProhibitOnions's RfA

Thank you, 49TL/Archive/April 2006!
	...for voting in my RFA. It passed with a result of 58/2/0. If you have any comments, or for some reason need any new-admin help, please let me know here. Sorry about the boilerplate. Regards, ProhibitOnions 22:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article up for deletion

Bit of a tricky situation about the article PS3Forums. If you go to the article for deletion page you will no what I am on about! Do you think I am correct about this article being used to increase popularity to the site (and in my opinion it sounds like an advertisment)? Just wanted your thoughts on it as I have you down as a good Wikipedian. Plus, do you know what happens to "Keep" votes from users who have registered an account just to support the PS3 Forums? --Thorpe | talk 23:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cigammagicwizard

Just to let you know, he vandalized Saw III again.--CyberGhostface 10:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you!
Hello 49TL/Archive/April 2006. Thank you for your support in my RfA! It passed with a final tally of 91/3/5. I am quite humbled and pleased by the community's show of confidence in me. If you need help or just want to talk, let me know. Cheers! -- F a ng Aili ^說嗎?

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donkey punch (third nomination)

Just curious, but you closed this as a speedy keep 21 minutes after it opened. That seems rash, so I thought I'd ask why, as no explanation was given. Steve block talk 21:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf Hitler article gets vandalized often. Should we delete it because someone inserts vandalism? -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 21:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are we discussing Adolf Hitler? Thought not. Moving on, you still reckon 21 minutes is a fair crack at the whip? I'm also concerned you don't feel that you should explain such a speedy decision when you make it. How many afd's an article has should never really become a bar to having one more. Steve block talk 21:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One of the votes was by a main contributor to the page who was also engaged in a revert war with the nominator, so I hope you'll agree that can be discounted, which leaves two speedy keep comments, coming in 10 minutes after the page was nominated. I wouldn't close that as a speedy close on the first day, let alone after 20 minutes. I'm concerned you don't feel the amount of time an article has been listed at afd matters, because that can lead to admin abuse and gaming the system. I can't se any reason how you can state there was an obvious consensus in a debate that had been open 21 minutes. Say the first three votes had read speedy delete. Would you have closed it delete? I'm also concerned you don't seem to see an issue with not explaining the speedy close. I'm also puzzled you see it as a bad faith nom, in the first sentence the nominator outlines three policies the article may breach. That's not a bad faith nomination. Steve block talk 21:40, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you are going to bed, I probably should too, but whilst it is fresh in mind, what I was trying to get across is this: you closed without explanation after 21 minutes without explanation. That seemed rash to me, so I asked you why. I still think 21 minutes is way too soon to be closing a deletion debate, and I'm a little troubled, if you'll forgive me for saying so, that you don't think you need to explain a close of that rapidity. I wasn't looking for the reopening of the debate, as much as wanting to point out that I felt a reason should have been given by the closing admin. I hope that clarifies things on my end better, and I apologise for not being clearer on that from the off. I think the Adolf Hitler thing just got up my nose, I can't see how it is at all relevant, and I apologise if I let that colour my tone. Steve block talk 22:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you're quite right, I've seen speedy's on just one vote before. The difference was, this didn't look a speedy to me. And speedy delete's are easier to understand, because a reason is given in the deletion, a speedy keep is harder to understand if no reason is given. See to me, that this article may violate three policies and has had two deletion debates already makes it contentious and perhaps not a speedy keep. But that's me. Like I say, I think I was more thrown by the 21 minutes and the lack of a reason, because it didn't look a no-brainer. Steve block talk 22:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think the consensus is that you had it right off the bat first time. Sorry for the way this went down. Steve block talk 18:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, seems a good plan. Apologies once again, and take it easy. Next time I come round here shooting my mouth off, feel free to ignore me. Steve block talk 18:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JohnnyBGood

I'm shortening his block to sixteen and a half hours. I don't like that phrase either but realistically, people do that all the time pointing to that meta policy and they never get reprimanded for it. To be more consistent with other users' consequences I'm shortening the block. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for supporting me in my RfA. I really didn't think people appreciate my work here that much, but it's nice to see you do: my Request was closed with 66 supports and 4 opposes. I'll do my best not to turn your confidence down. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. --Dijxtra 11:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again, Mark83 08:59, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

I've noticed that some users have fancy signatures with pics and links to their talk, contrib, etc. pages. Do you, by any chance, know how to do that?—GH 21:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to your preferences
Check the checkbox that says "Raw signature"
Add the HTML under "Nickname", for example: — [[User:GHe|GH]] ([[User_talk:GHe|talk]]) would look like this: —GH (talk)

— nath a nrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 22:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all!—G.He_(Talk!) 22:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:70.69.239.136

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-04-15 09:59Z

Happy Easter!

Please put all tasty Easter wishes here!

Happy Easter! These special Easter eggs were laid just for you by an evil bunny! — nath a nrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 05:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's bunny time - Happy Easter FireFox! (I recommend custard doughnuts and Fanta to help the chocolate go down). --Alf ^melmac 16 April 2006
Happy Easter! --Misza 13 ^{T C} 10:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC)]][reply]
Chocolate eggs for FireFox. :D Happy Easter! Sango 123 (e) 14:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Happy Easter/Have a good Passover/Have a nice day...or this bunny will eat you :) Wh e re ^(talk) 15:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just happy Easter wishes (or whatever it is that you celebrate) from a fellow Esperanza member to another. (Hope you didn't mind me turning the gifts into a little gallery—if you don't, you can just revert it) :) —Mir l e n 18:30, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a cool picture, but Happy Easter all the same! --light darkness^(talk) 18:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He is Risen!

Jesus Christ is risen today, Alleluia!
our triumphant holy day, Alleluia!
who did once upon the cross, Alleluia!
suffer to redeem our loss. Alleluia!

Hymns of praise then let us sing, Alleluia!
unto Christ, our heavenly King, Alleluia!
who endured the cross and grave, Alleluia!
sinners to redeem and save. Alleluia!

But the pains which he endured, Alleluia!
our salvation have procured, Alleluia!
now above the sky he's King, Alleluia!

where the angels ever sing. Alleluia!

-- Psy guy ^Talk 05:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, 49TL/Archive/April 2006! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. PS2pcGAMER (talk) 09:53, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Brandt - Where is the ArbCom Ruling?

I would have asked on the talk page but it is blocked as well. I assume there is a log of such actions.--Tbeatty 17:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is just the block history. I was looking for an ArbCom ruling or a complaint (the Wikipedia_talk:block_log doesn't have any discussion of a ruling. Was it just a unilateral action by Gamaliel? If so the tag should be changed.--Tbeatty 17:40, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aministrators and there should be a log of discussion or an RfA. Also, by locking the talk page, there is no way for the user to request an {{unblock}}. I think a permanent ban is out of order and there should be avenues for him to appeal. --Tbeatty 00:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter

Everyone else seems to have stolen all the good Easter pictures and stuff, but I wish you a Happy Easter all the same. — FireFox • T [15:51, 16 April 2006]

Domo Arigato, happy easter to you too. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 19:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Visit My Page

Could you visit my page? [[1]] Cigammagicwizard 21:03, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

205.188.116.5

~~205.188.116.5 has been repeatedly vandalizing Pi. Please look into the situation ASAP.—G.He_(Talk!) 21:17, 16 April 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

(Apparently stopped for now)

My RFA

Many thanks for your vote on my recent RFA, which passed narrowly. I will try to be worthy of your support. Regards, Kaisershatner 21:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox tracking

Hi Firefox, Do you know if it is possible to see which people have a certain userbox on their personal pages? EKN 21:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)EKN

Master Jay's RfA

Hi FireFox. Thanks for your support at my recent RfA. If you have any concerns, please contact me here. Cheers! --Jay(Reply) 01:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:EKN

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:EKN. Arniep 17:26, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

Catch me on IRC sometime. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 20:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks

"If you wish to make useful contributions, we encourage you to create a new account." (from User talk:Bb1230)

Isn't that just encouraging someone to sock puppet to avoid a block? (Maybe I'm missing something about the situation. ---J.Smith 10:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno... Isn't it expressly against the rules to create a new account to evade a block... even if your suddenly a saint? ---J.Smith 10:47, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arn't people who are indef blocked people we've decided as a community that we don't want to edit here? And also, isn't this completely side-stepping the {{unblock}} request procedure? This strikes me a terrible thing to suggest to blocked people. "It doesnt matter that your blocked. Our enforcement means nothing. Just make a new account." ---J.Smith 10:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copied your status

I hope you don't mind but from you user page I noticed you have a status for online/offline. I have copied this idea for my user page but have modified it. Did you come up with this? --Thorpe | talk 13:27, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Old Skool Esperanzial note

Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower ^háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza eligebile voters list

My name is on the Esperanza members list, but not on the eligible voters list. As far I know, the requirements for both are the same. Could you please fix this, or if this my error, could you please inform me on how to get on the eligebile voters list.

Thanks, Kumarhk (talk · contribs · count)

blocking

Hi Firefox. By the time I realised I had forgotten to set the block to indefinite it had already been fixed; I guess this is one of those less haste more speed things :). Anyway, thanks for sorting that out for me. Rje 19:32, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia-esperanza

I used to be a spammer, but I have changed my ways, and I have joined esperanza. May my IP address, which is chatzill@d58-104-10-116.dsl.vic.optusnet.com.au, please be unbanned from the IRC Channel #wikipedia-esperanza? -sahan x

That's up to the person who banned you in the first place, which, according to the log was Titoxd. — nath a nrd o tcom ^{(T • C • W)} 08:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is Moe

The above is a talk page archive for Xy7. Please do not edit this page. To leave a message, please see the current talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.