User talk:49.150.110.214

This is 49.150.110.214's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aizu Bus (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources do not establish notability, and much of the content is unsupported and made up of bullet points without much context. Also, reads like a corporate brochure rather than an encyclopaedia entry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aizu Bus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aizu Bus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 49.150.110.214! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 05:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

49.150.110.214 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to unblock temporary this IP address, so I would discuss at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. 49.150.110.214 (talk) 03:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you want to appeal your block you can post the appeal here and I will place it at ANI for you. Given your disruption on that very page in the past I do not think unblocking you to post there directly is a good idea. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 03:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you need to discuss at ANI? This IP address has been blocked for abuse and repeated block evasion by an originating user - Frontman830. Are you this person? If so, if you can log into your account, I can try and help you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what about DrKay? does they have evidence with this?

[1] DrKay refraining CapitolKing's talk page
[2] DrKay was blocked on Wikipedia six times and for three times involved edit warring on Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton and Trinity College, Cambridge (for suspected reasons)
[3] DrKay caught abusing Jonesey95 on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

--49.150.110.214 (talk) 03:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

49.150.110.214 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to appeal this block by following these evidence of DrKay's allegations:

[4] DrKay refraining CapitolKing's talk page
[5] DrKay was blocked on Wikipedia six times and for three times involved edit warring on Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton and Trinity College, Cambridge (for suspected reasons)
[6] DrKay caught harassing other administrator Jonesey95 on ANI

But I have to try this time, for second chance. 49.150.110.214 (talk) 03:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not an appeal and I will not be posting it to ANI. It is a series of comments on another editor. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 03:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have this evidence involving DrKay dealing with Peter Ormond for disruptive, harassment and personal attacks as a violation of terms of use. --49.150.110.214 (talk) 03:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked repeatedly from this website. You are not welcome and you are not part of the community. Per Wikipedia:THREESTRIKES you are banned from the community. I suggest you take your concerns about the foundation to the foundation. You may not use this talk page to continue to attack users. I am revoking your talk page access. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 03:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 03:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.