Jump to content

User talk:47.223.58.232

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jadyn Douglas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 00:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mariah Carey (album), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m doing my best, this is actually in her songwriters biography too. But would that get flagged for “original research too”. I don’t know 47.223.58.232 (talk) 01:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mariah Carey (album). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, could it simply be written that Love Takes Time is not on all editions of the album. Is that ok with the wikipedia admins.? 47.223.58.232 (talk) 02:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse.
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.
Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block.

IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He was the one deleting undeniable proven sources but alright. I’ll miss you guys. I guess I have to go watch some TV now. 47.223.58.232 (talk) 05:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not to gloat, but I warned you Facepalm Facepalm. dxneo (talk) 07:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
About what? Who are you. Are you the guy who pretended To Last isn’t on the vinyl when I literally played it last night, and then blocked me. 47.223.58.232 (talk) 09:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an admin, so technically I cannot block you. I did not pretend, I follow the guidelines, you should too. dxneo (talk) 12:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.223.58.232 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yamla, Ohnoitsjamie, and Ferret. Please please please someone help my unblock appeal is completely bugged on the ticket request system, please someone look into it. It has been staleblocked for a month. My account is EmeraldWicket9947 that’s also what the ticket request is made for, please fix my ticket request it’s locked and hopeless, I’m hopeless. https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/public/appeal/view

Decline reason:

Evading your block and pinging me just restarts the six month WP:STANDARDOFFER timer. TPA also revoked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

47.223.58.232 (talk) 11:50, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing's broken, you just failed to convince anyone at UTRS to take action. Honestly, someone just needs to decline that request. Additionally, I'll note you are banned, not just blocked, and were caught evading your ban quite recently. There's no reasonable chance your ban will be lifted at this time. --Yamla (talk) 12:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]