User talk:3tmx

Comment

Hi. Please dont tamper with the comments of other users as you did at the talk page for the Totnes Community magazine. BTW putting an empty template on the article is not nominating it for deletion and so I removed that as well but of course if you afd it properly that is fine and if you add comments to the talk page that would be great, SqueakBox 20:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original comments my own (I had not signed in initially), however I am now aware that was not following wikipedia good practice by editing my own comments in this manner.

3tmx 20:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from RichardWeiss! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome SqueakBox 20:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

photo editinog

Hi 3tmx - The changes were

spelling fix (propoganda --> propaganda)
unlinking bare years (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers))
wikifying complete dates (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers))
unlinking common words (see Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context

Colonies Chris 12:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Photo editing

Hi 3tmx, thanks for your comment to me about the article Photo editing. I'm afraid I'm too busy at the minute to help you with this. Would you like me to pass this onto the administrators noticeboard for further review? --Deskana (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo editing RfC

Hi – there's a Request for comments up at the Photo editing talk page and I'm hopeful we can reach a sustainable compromise on the disputed section. To avoid having to take it up a level to the RfC disputes page, I wonder if you could drop by and add your two cents this weekend, maybe there'll be a consensus by Monday.. high hopes.. things seem to have calmed down at least, so there's grounds for optimism :o) mikaul^talk 17:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peaches Geldof

I'm not quite sure what you are referring to. I didn't change anything, apart from trying to format the information already there. I didn't give justification to anyone's edits. Jdcooper 17:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was there on the wiki formatting bit, but wasn't showing. I tried to fix it but I'm crap at that stuff, so I just left it as best as I could. Check the talk page, I've fixed it now. No offence caused, never fear. I'm going to do some sourcing and sorting on here for the next little while, this page is pissing me off. Jdcooper 17:22, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove comments from catholic just because you are a prodestent

Just because you don't believe in the church does not mean you should remove user comments. Jmm6f488 10:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Er, no. You are completely misunderstanding the use of a talk page its not a forum and you are not assuming good faith. Where have i said "i don't believe in the church"

3tmx 10:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm not a "prodestent" 3tmx 10:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I was being a total asshole. This page has be vandalized before, I just got a little heated. Please accept my total apologies. Jmm6f488 10:15, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I should not of jumped to conclusions. Jmm6f488 10:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we request check user for Miley hilary and XXdisneyfanXX?

See subject. James Luftan ^contribs 18:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, very unusual. I understand disney fan being on her own AfD, but Miley hilary, a day old account? James Luftan ^contribs 18:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll be fine. I'm going to put an entry at suspected sockpuppets first. James Luftan ^contribs 18:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Xxdisneyxfanxx James Luftan ^contribs 19:14, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why would justlit nominate his own article for deletion? James Luftan ^contribs 22:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. I originally thought of disneyfan and miley being sockpuppets, but what you said convinced me that Justlit was involved; I corrected the sockpuppet page and put him as the master. It's a shame that the admins barely pay attention to that page anymore. James Luftan ^contribs 23:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to Woddup, he copied from a previous AfD: "Comment: Justlit appears to have copied the first few lines of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexa Nikolas. WODUP 12:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)" James Luftan ^contribs 23:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab

You've been listed as a party at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-08-17 Photo editing. If you'd like to participate, please follow the instructions on the page, otherwises, remove your name. Cool Blue^{talk to me} 00:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-ejaculate

Please see Talk:Pre-ejaculate/Archive 1#Linkimage_template_removed for a response. This is clearly a content dispute, not a matter of misbehavior or a personal conflict. Please keep the discussion of the article at the article's talk page. Thank you. 68.163.219.59 11:58, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Faile (artist collective)

Can I thank you for your intervention on Faile (artist collective). I'd felt quite deflated by the advertiser reinstating his advert despite my request for him to desist. Revitalised, I hope to get the page up to GA status soon!!! Thanks again. Robertlondon 20:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bat For Lashes

There is no reason to miss-off information which users may like to know. Having the time an event happened, like an announcement of prize winner at an event where the jury pick the winner only minutes before the actual announcement is made, is not a stylist choice or problem for an encyclopedia such as this. And it most certainly is not an over promotion of the events, in a hyping-up fashion, either. Jimthing 00:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever... it's on Discogs, so that'll do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimthing (talk • contribs) 17:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Miley Cyrus

I just removed the section about "radiohead" that you added to the controversies section of the Miley Cyrus article. The topic was talked about on the talk page and the final decision was to leave it out as it is not a real controversy (see: Talk:Miley Cyrus#Radiohead). —Frehley ^Space ^Ace 22:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]