Jump to content

User talk:3finger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user may have left Wikipedia. 3finger has not edited Wikipedia since December 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, 3finger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - OAS ^{talk to me} 00:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

moved

I moved your temp article to Dorothy Lucey, just so you know. Thanks for writing a replacement for the copyvio article. You might want to add a category to the article though. --W.marsh 17:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jill De Vries

Remember to mark your edits as minor only when they genuinely are (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'." --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

In your new articles, please spell the "links" in the header "External links" with a lowercase 'l'. It's standard on Wikipedia. Thank you. --MZMcBride 03:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AJ Alexander

Since you created the AJ Alexander article, I'm hoping that you can fill me in on something. Did you get the text of the article from Elite Bunnies or are they taking content from Wikipedia without giving credit? Dismas|^(talk) 15:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's what I thought. Dismas|^(talk) 22:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Kimberly Evenson‎

Sorry. JerryVanF (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Playmate stats on Wikipedia

Someone keeps vandalizing/removing the playmate stats in the article on Playboy playmate Stephanie Adams. Take a look if you have time. 208.120.11.116 (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Veronica Gamba

The article Veronica Gamba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person: neither Playboy nor IMDB are suitable sources on which to base such an article. All but one of the articles on "Playboy Playmates of 1983" have the same problem and have also been proposed for deletion. Kayfabe backstories from Playboy are not reliable sources for such articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jackie Rainbow

The article Jackie Rainbow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Diane Hunter

The article Diane Hunter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pat Lawler

The article Pat Lawler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anne Fleming (model)

The article Anne Fleming (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbara Cameron

The article Barbara Cameron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lynn Turner (model)

The article Lynn Turner (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rusty Fisher

The article Rusty Fisher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marion Scott (model)

The article Marion Scott (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gloria Walker

The article Gloria Walker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alice Denham

The article Alice Denham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elsa Sørensen

The article Elsa Sørensen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gloria Windsor

The article Gloria Windsor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carrie Radison

The article Carrie Radison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean Jani

The article Jean Jani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dolores Donlon

The article Dolores Donlon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jacquelyn Prescott

The article Jacquelyn Prescott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marlene Callahan

The article Marlene Callahan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Linda Vargas

The article Linda Vargas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cheryl Kubert

The article Cheryl Kubert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zahra Norbo

The article Zahra Norbo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eleanor Bradley

The article Eleanor Bradley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Audrey Daston

The article Audrey Daston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nancy Crawford

The article Nancy Crawford has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Laura Lyons

I have nominated Laura Lyons, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Lyons. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 01:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Daina House

I have nominated Daina House, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daina House. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 20:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Deborah Borkman

I have nominated Deborah Borkman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Borkman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 20:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ann Pennington (model)

I have nominated Ann Pennington (model), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Pennington (model). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Patricia McClain

I have nominated Patricia McClain, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia McClain. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 20:20, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Debra Peterson

I have nominated Debra Peterson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Peterson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Hope Olson

I have nominated Hope Olson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope Olson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Whitney Kaine

I have nominated Whitney Kaine, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitney Kaine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Karen Hafter

I have nominated Karen Hafter, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Hafter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Gig Gangel

I have nominated Gig Gangel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gig Gangel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lisa Welch

I have nominated Lisa Welch, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Welch. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Victoria Cooke

I have nominated Victoria Cooke, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Cooke. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Veronica Gamba

I have nominated Veronica Gamba, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Gamba. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 00:59, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Priscilla Taylor

I have nominated Priscilla Taylor, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Taylor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. The Wordsmith^Communicate 17:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Nadine Chanz

I have nominated Nadine Chanz, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadine Chanz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. The Wordsmith^Communicate 17:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jackie Rainbow

I have nominated Jackie Rainbow, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Rainbow. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NW (Talk) 11:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Janet Quist

I have nominated Janet Quist, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Quist. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Off2riorob (talk) 21:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello 3finger! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sondra Theodore - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Janis Schmitt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janis Schmitt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janis Schmitt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 01:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heidi Sorenson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heidi Sorenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Sorenson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 01:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sondra Theodore for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sondra Theodore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sondra Theodore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 01:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicki Thomas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicki Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicki Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 01:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Welch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Welch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Welch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 01:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lynda Wiesmeier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lynda Wiesmeier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynda Wiesmeier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 02:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rhonda Adams for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhonda Adams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 02:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Veronica Gamba for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veronica Gamba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Gamba until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 02:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruth Guerri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruth Guerri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Guerri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 02:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mardi Jacquet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mardi Jacquet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mardi Jacquet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 02:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Debra Jensen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debra Jensen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Jensen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 02:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melinda Mays for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melinda Mays is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melinda Mays until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Denise McConnell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denise McConnell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise McConnell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jennifer Miriam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Miriam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Miriam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathryn Morrison (model) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathryn Morrison (model) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Morrison (model) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheila Mullen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheila Mullen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Mullen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carina Persson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carina Persson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carina Persson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teri Peterson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teri Peterson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teri Peterson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Virve Reid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Virve Reid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virve Reid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 03:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marilyn Waltz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marilyn Waltz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Waltz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonnie Nicely for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonnie Nicely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonnie Nicely until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fasttimes68 (talk) 06:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria Checa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Checa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Checa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeane Manson

The article Jeane Manson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable model, singer and actor fails the notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 15:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:3finger&oldid=1146719694"