User talk:3 kids in a trenchcoat

Welcome!

Hello, 3 kids in a trenchcoat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - FieldMarine (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jarjaraya has been accepted

Jarjaraya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Brihaspati (talk) 10:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uskaf has been accepted

Uskaf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humaniya has been accepted

Humaniya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nil, Iraq has been accepted

Nil, Iraq, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 20:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sahar, Bihar has been accepted

Sahar, Bihar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sahar, Bihar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jambughoda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheosagar has been accepted

Sheosagar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karakat has been accepted

Karakat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zanimum (talk) 13:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hashteank has been accepted

Hashteank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 3 kids in a trenchcoat! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Could someone help translate this source from Persian into English?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maryanaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mikhlaf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kitab al-Buldan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Asadabad, Iran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Khosrow

Dehri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cinema

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gach Sar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bugloss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chenari, India has been accepted

Chenari, India, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clarityfiend (talk) 22:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Temay El Amdeed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Markaz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nasser, Egypt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Markaz

Shuhada, Egypt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Markaz

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Surajpura, Rohtas a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 03:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rohtas block has been accepted

Rohtas block, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AugusteBlanqui (talk) 09:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheosagar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sewer and Scooter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashmun al-Rumman has been accepted

Ashmun al-Rumman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 17:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kochas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sewer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aba al-Waqf has been accepted

Aba al-Waqf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SamHolt6 (talk) 01:32, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ibyar has been accepted

Ibyar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ibyar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zawiya.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Majhauli Raj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salempur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milig, Egypt has been accepted

Milig, Egypt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 09:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colonelganj, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mustard, Mahadeo and Gonda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi I’m just reviewing Ashmun al-Rumman. Thanks for creating this well-sourced article. Happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 19:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Meymeh

added links pointing to Potter, Shahrestan and Dehestan

Dalmau

added links pointing to Bhawan and Lalganj

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New stubs on Indian places

Hallo and thank you for the work you are putting in to creating new stubs for Indian villages. But there are a few problems with today's creations,starting with Gyanpur, Barhara.

You have linked to Bhojpur district, but this is disambiguation page because there is a district of the same name in Nepal. The link you intended is Bhojpur district, India.

There is an easy way to avoid linking to disambiguation pages: if you go to "Preferences", "Gadgets", and look under "Appearance" you'll see "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange" towards the bottom of the section. Select that tickbox, and whenever you Preview a page you'll be able to see whether you've accidentally linked to a disambiguation page. I find it really useful.

You have given a lot of the articles a disambiguated title such as Nathmalpur, Barhara even where there is no article at Nathmalpur. There is no special rule about Indian placenames which allows this (unlike United States places), so they should each be at the simple place name.
But where you need to disambiguate the title, as at Gyanpur, Barhara, then you must make sure that the reader can find the article when they search on Gyanpur. In this case it needed a hatnote (I've added it): in other cases it will be a matter of adding an entry in a disambiguation page. But there must be a route from the basic title to the new article, to help readers and also to reduce the chance that a future careless editor will accidentally create a duplicate article at a slightly different title. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 13:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--- Hi Pam, thanks for your concern and for the advice on displaying disambig links. I will definitely be using that from now on. Now for the fun part: going back and de-disambiguating all the links I left behind! As for the overly precise titles, I've been doing that intentionally to avoid potential naming conflicts with other villages in the same state or even district. You're right that in many cases this is unneccessary, so I'll go ahead and move the pages to more concise titles wherever appropriate.

Thanks again,

3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talbant Aga has been accepted

Talbant Aga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 02:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phernouphis has been accepted

Phernouphis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 02:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bir El Hafey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fig.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finik has been accepted

Finik, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umm Ubayda has been accepted

Umm Ubayda, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 13:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helmand Province, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alizai.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanaa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tanker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kakori, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karimabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gauria Kalan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahmudabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm being silly

I like your username, but you oviously must be blocked per WP:NOSHARE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång No worries, just change it to 1 kid in a trenchcoat and all will be well 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 06:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pura Bahadur

Hello 3 kids in a trenchcoat I have added projects India, Geography, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 04:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Japra

Hello 3 kids in a trenchcoat I have added projects India, Geography, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 04:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarojaninagar has been accepted

Sarojaninagar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jaunpur

Hi! I've had the the two moves reverted. I see your point here: the UP city is definitely the most significant topic with the name, but it has been at its title for a decade and a half. I'm not saying established titles are always OK – a lot of the time they're not – but if it's an established title and it's not on the sort of obscure topic that may have escaped editor attention for that long, then it's best to propose the move via an RM. At the very least, after a successful RM you'll be insured against people like me coming and speedily reverting it :)

As for Jaunpur specifically, one suggestion against a primary topic comes from the clickstream data, which shows that just at most one half of readers who land on the dab page end up clicking through to the article about the city. The precise figures for March (the last month for which I've got easily accessible data), are 52 for that city, 32 for the sultanate, and 10 each for its district and for Tehri Garhwal (the two constituencies don't figure here, which means they've received fewer than 10 hits each). – Uanfala (talk) 14:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Uanfala: Yes you're right, a conventional RM is definitely the way to go here. I've opened one up at Talk:Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh, so feel free to comment on it if you want. 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 17:56, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hello 3 kids in a trenchcoat,

Thanks for your great contributions!

You've written a good many articles about the villages and places in India and continuing to contribute more, why don't you consider putting in a request for WP:Autopatrolled right as you regularly create pages and we find pretty much no issues with your creations. This really would help reduce the workload of WP:New page review in some ways. So do mull over it and if you wish to apply, click here.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:39, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I will go ahead and do as you suggest. Thanks 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Umara Mau

Hi, this newly created Redirect points to an non-existing article, can you check where you wanted it to point to before it gets tagged CSD G8. Thanks for your edits. JW 1961^Talk 18:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I see you have now created an article to fix the redlink in the redirect - all is good! JW 1961^Talk 18:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi 3 kids in a trenchcoat, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Jake Wartenberg (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2021 starts today

Hello,
WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2021 starts today. The India WikiProject has a backlog of around 10,000 unassessed articles, built up over the last few years. The time has come for comprehensive housekeeping and that's what this drive is all about. The drive will run from 1 September 2021 to 30 September 2021.

We request you to participate in the assessment drive. Learn more about the event here, learn assessment process and rewards details. Please add your name as a participant here.

Feel free to discuss this on the event talk page or at WikiProject India noticeboard.

You received this message, because you participated in earlier iteration of the assessment drive, or we felt that you may be interested to participate. --Titodutta (talk) 02:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Çanlı Kilise has been accepted

Çanlı Kilise, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Daulatpur, Uttar Pradesh a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Daulatpur, Kadipur. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review or Create 'Kohra (estate)'

Link is given below 👇 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kohra_(estate) DrhSR (talk) 23:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Creation

Kohra, Amethi DrhSR (talk) 17:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated references

Hi, first of all, I believe it's quite admirable that you take the time to consistently make major additions with good sources. I wanted to point out that you don't have to add the same reference (with the same page number) after every sentence. Instead, if several consecutive sentences are supported by the same page of the same source, I suggest you add a single inline citation after the last consecutive sentence that is backed up by that source. The overrepetition of inline citations may bloat the reference section with a large amount of reference indices. (I hope that's the correct terminology; it's, you know, the list that goes from a to z and beyond for repeated citations in the reference list.) This may make it appear to unrelated editors that the article largely relies on a single source. You might additionally want to integrate the page number within the references, instead of using Template:Rp, so that in the reference section, we will be able to view the page numbers, which will prevent the clutter of large amounts of reference indices. I am looking forward to more of your great contributions! Aintabli (talk) 04:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aintabli Thank you! I know my practice of citing every sentence is less than ideal -- not only does it clutter up the reference section like you mention, but I suspect it also can be intimidating for readers. I know it would be for me.

My main reason for doing this is that I want to make sure it's clear where every piece of information is coming from. Sometimes when trying to add new content to an article, I'll come across a paragraph and only see the one reference tag at the end, and that makes me hesitant about inserting new content into the middle of that paragraph. So my citing every sentence is in order to save someone that headache in the future (whether that's me or someone else). And also because it makes it more convenient to check if I got something wrong or misinterpreted what they're originally saying.

But yeah, there's got to be a better way to do that. I'll have to try playing around with different templates and see what works best for me. Or actually what I might end up doing is just putting a comment with the page number inside after sentences so that it shows up in edit mode but not when you're just reading the article.

Anyway, sorry about the rant. Thanks for your concern and suggestion, and I also look forward to seeing more of your edits too!

Wishing you the best,
3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 05:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I actually believe that it is okay to specify the page number in the reference, but when for example, we have two sentences "The house is up the hill.[1]:4 There is a tree next to the house.[1]:4", we can instead write "The house is up the hill. There is a tree next to the house.[1]:4". So, we basically remove the identical reference coming before. However, if the first and second sentences come from different pages, your style is okay. In that case, it would be like "The house is up the hill.[1]:4 There is a tree next to the house.[1]:19." If I have confused you in my first comment, sorry. Perhaps, I could word it better. As far as I can see in your latest edits, you are commenting out the page numbers. What I meant was you can just merge identical references with the same page numbers into one. Editors will look at the nearest reference from left to right, so you should be good if one sentence lacks a reference right after it ends, because editors will correctly assume that the statement is supported by the closest reference. Thank you for your cooperation. Aintabli (talk) 04:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	This is for your tireless efforts and great contribution. I noticed that you have made significant contribution in place related wiki articles. I noticed you first when i checked history of one village of Bhojpur district. Keep going. Admantine123 (talk) 20:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Amalsad

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Amalsad, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:45, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, 3 kids in a trenchcoat. Thank you for your work on Ratibhanpur. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to add wikiproject templates to the talk page while creating an article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:04, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, 3 kids in a trenchcoat. Thank you for your work on Allau. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please remember to add wikiproject templates to the talk pages of any articles that you create

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:49, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Geography Barnstar
		I noticed you creating a lot of start geography articles! Keep it up.

Masohpotato (talk) 03:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability requirements for populated places

Please note that the notability quideline at Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) states that Census tracts, Abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable. This means that such places must have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject in order to be deemed notable and avoid being deleted. Donald Albury 22:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Albury I assume this is referring to Baghai, Firozabad (census code 125443), Rampur, Tundla (census code 125462), etc.? Those are full-fledged villages and not census tracts; they shouldn't have any trouble meeting the "populated, legally recognized places" criterion for notability as it currently stands. The "census code" thing is just there as a clunky way of distinguishing between multiple villages in the same subdivision that have the same name. (I've seen this done elsewhere, e.g. Barwa, Narkatiaganj (census code 216634); I think I've also seen similar disambiguations done by using the places' coordinates, which is also kind of awkward but might avoid these kinds of issues.)
Anyway, we can definitely rename the articles if that helps at all. Let me know if you have any preference.
Thanks,
3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 02:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:11th-century diarists has been nominated for merging

Category:11th-century diarists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]