User talk:3-chocolate

Speedy deletion of Novena darmawan

A tag has been placed on Novena darmawan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. 9Nak (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Novena darmawan. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. 9Nak (talk) 12:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Dakota Fanning. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DoubleBlue (Talk) 06:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dakota Fanning. Vishnava_talk 06:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Novena Darmawan

A tag has been placed on Novena Darmawan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. DoubleBlue (Talk) 06:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

okaaay geez man or woman!

--3-chocolate (talk) 06:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)(Talk)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Novena Darmawan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DoubleBlue (Talk) 06:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to write that content to your user page instead. It does not belong in Wikipedia. DoubleBlue (Talk) 06:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes it does! stop lying! i was the one who created it! so there missy!

--3-chocolate (talk) 06:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)talk[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated bad page creation; vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

—slakr^\ talk / 06:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]